Member Info for mouchers

Ok Jimmy, apologies if you think I'm de-ramping, I did say that my first impressions were that it was what we already knew, and I have no issue with you correcting me if I am incorrect. However if my comments are being perceived as such I'll cease to provide opinion or perspective.

As I also stated, great to see the positivity, but perhaps the haste to accuse others with opinions that differ to your own is what causes some to think that this board is not so much a forum for discussion, and is more a collective of myopic thought, where those who dare to even suggest there is another possibility face unfounded accusations.

Aim - yes I agree, you are correct.

Perhaps I'm too much of a pessimist; I need to remind myself (or be reminded) that this is indeed another great invention/application, rather than be concerned about whether these companies that have Diesel Generators that are doing just as they need them to already, might just hypocritically prioritise their bottom line (just stick with what they have) over backing up their environmentally friendly rhetoric (by splashing out on 'bolt-on' decarbonizing piece of kit like AFC are showcasing today).

Good, I'm glad to read the positivity here, as to be honest at first scan on the RNS I thought perhaps we were being told what we already knew (what they were showing and where and why), albeit in a lot more paragraphs.

Still.....I see the word "potential" is used more in this RNS (again) than "sales". Guess I'll need to continue to be patient for the RNS that I have been waiting for for 10 years+.

Any of you Tech guys know how this GeoPura kit compares to ours?

Seems I haven't done enough 'do your own research' as this is the 1st I've heard of GeoPura, and it seems they're doing pretty much the same as we are.

Hoping someone can point out flaws in their kit or why ours is very much superior....?

Notes: "A list of confirmed venues on the website this morning please Adam"......plus a list of the Hotels please to prove this isn't just a Jollyboys outing of 5* Hotels and fine dining all on our shareholder Dollar.....

Lucky - yea, I see your point, some of those 7 weeks were Christmas and NY too so fair enough.

Lucky - apologies and I admire the positivity but you're sounding like AB:
"AFC have gone commercial (have they? Is not selling one still deemed commercial?) showing us one of the products available",
"we have a significant interest in the larger units! (but we haven't sold any)",
"interested parties (who haven't bought any)",
"probably wanting multiples (probably?)",
"large contracts likely to go into the millions (but no actual contracts)!!",
"have faith (I'm glad you have some, as my faith in AFC is dwindling)",
"we are finally there (really?)",
"just have to wait a couple of months (there we go again, wait, and wait, and wait...)",
"calm down (OK, I'll try)".

I only keep a holding of AFC now through fear alone, fear of having been in for 10 years or so, and then being out AFC if amazingly it did hit £1, but I often think; "why? Will you never learn?? How many times must I read or hear the same repeative constant "we hope to", "potential", "we will develop" etc. etc. words??".

£18.55k and £16.61k were both buys. Good to see. Although as ever you have to track back to the actual time to see the trade type, LSE again using the random trade type colour generator.

Iwant - "IIs don’t spend their time doing mere £1m transactions to make a quick turn".

Yes, sometimes they do and it seems likely that yes they have.

It's hardy a conspiracy theory to think that the recent multiple huge £200k+ trades have nothing to do with us recently giving £2m worth of shares at a great discount people who job and sole purpose is to make money.

I fear for the SP tomorrow as the 1st £1m given for 17p that can be sold tomorrow might also be shifted for a profit.

Daz thanks for pointing that out.

However, if someone has £1m to spend like they have, they'd likely have £450k spare to cover their bets with as you suggest.

I think it looks very fishy is all, too coincidental, and it p**s*s me off a bit tbh, that as long as you have £1m then the AFC management are happy to hand you loads of free money where you just can't lose.......while we anxiously look at our much lesser holdings watching the sp being manipulated.

If it was him/her, he's now got his/her average down to 15p in the space of a few hours.

It's things like this that make u realise us small fry PIs are fighting a losing battle ffs.

So.....lets hope at least 1 of the 1m shares trades was a buy otherwise it may seem a little too coincidentally that a 'lone £1m investor' buys in at 17p just before someone starts offloading £203k lumps at 20p+ a day later......

09:31 800000 looks like a buy.
11:40 1000000 looks like a buy.
14:28 1000000 looks like a sell.

Good point chippy, I see what you mean.

However, I'll still hold for now rather than add, as; 'commenced conversations', 'prospective customers', 'are expected to contribute', and 'to support demonstration and commercial activity in 2020' (when in 2020??) don't suggest imminent orders to me.

Win win though I suppose as if I'm wrong I'll still be riding the wave.

Well in the overwhelmingly positive response on this board, I feel Adamadd perhaps has a point, a word of caution maybe, as the RNS does have the same old wording we've heard so many times before: prospective, commenced....etc.

We want definitely and definitive no?

Why has nooone even mentioned or suggested this is a cash call and further dilution? I don't mean to bash because perhaps I'm missing something.

I suppose I just don't see it as massively positive an rns as others seem to have interpreted it today is all.

Bradezzzz - who knows why, if your question is not rhetorical then perhaps you should ask the creators of this website.

Donotpanic - absolutely agree; if they have nothing invested or nothing to gain from a drop why post here saying "doom doom doom"? Surely they don't expect those invested to believe they've given their time to kindly post to save us all from ourselves.....!

"Can anyone explain to me why this question comes up so often on LSE"....?

The LSE buy and sell list is automatically generated and doesn't take into account the real mid range price. The only way to know what is really a buy and what is really a sell is to watch the mid price all day. But if you were a regular trader you'd know that already.

If you trade regularly you'll soon see that often your buys are shown as sells on this site, and your sells are shown as buys.

In the same way that we couldn't get above 5p in November despite there being many large buys (due to a big seller in the background), could the SP be being held up today by an undisclosed buyer in the background despite quite a lot of large 5 figure sells in the last few hours? Does it work both ways?

Monkshood - do you have a theory of why RSG seems to bd overlooked? Most shares would double and more with the amount of quality RNS's we've had recently!