Member Info for Moneyman64

All that shareholders want is
1-A CEO who keeps his word-not one that makes promises/sets deadlines in public interviews that are not met or achieved.Even an explanation of the failures would be welcome.
Some of RYs statements have clearly been misleading -look what happened to Tesla and Elon Musk when he made a misleading statement.
2-A company who has the courtesy to reply to shareholders' e-mails-in my experience Amur is the only listed company that ignores and does not reply to shareholders' e-mails .
I know this will upset the R.Y fan club but is this too much to ask?

To use the football analogy much rather Amur did a "Bournemouth"
In the same time I have held shares in Amur Bournemouth have gone from bottom of league division two on minus 17 points to a maintaining a regular spot in the Premiership.
This is down to good management-wish RY had produced similar results in respect of shareprice and market capitalisation

RY and his buddies have been attending these events for years and to date appear to have obtained nothing tangible -no investment(with the exception of the shareholder value destroying deals with Crede and Riverfort),no joint ventures and no evidence of third party interest in the project.
Hope RY does not treat these events in the same way he treats us long term shareholders-broken promises and missed deadlines.
Perhaps if he produced the PFS somebody might show an interest

Has anyone seen or heard from R.Y lately-after the last total misleading interview he seems to have vanished.
Reckon he has been in Russia too long and judging by the continual misinformation he feeds us ahareholders he has attended an "FSB misinformation course"
Persumably any e-mails to him to ask what is going on will be ignored ,showing the contempt he has for the long term shareholders.
Bet Riverfort know exactly what is happening

Ever since the Licence was granted all R.Y has really achieved is to crash the shareprice from 40p to 4p.
This has been brought about by a combination of missed deadlines,broken promises and two "Wonga" typed finance deals that have diluted long term interests and achieved little.
It amazes me that if the resource is so big with so much potential why has R.Y not been able to attract a serious investor/miner to come on board -is it through lack of trying because he thinks his position might be threatened?
Whatever happened to the media week,the PFS and the other exiting news-all we ever hear about is holes being dug in the ground and people like Riverfort and Crede profiting at the expense as long term shareholders.
What exactly are R.Y and his team upto-we need a detailed explanation of what is and what is not happening and not just more broken promises and mist deadlines.

I have suspected this for some time-this might explain R.Y s continued broken promises and missed deadlines.
R.Y is currently lining up all his ducks 🦆 to issue just enough information to secure the next tranche from Riverfort to pay his salary for the foreseeable future.
No wonder he is thanking for the shareholders in today's report -for hovering up Riverfort's shares to keep his salary going
Be nice for once if news releases could be timed for the benefit of shareholders and not RY and Riverfort

Sure one day this will in the words of Basil Brush will be "Boom boom"
Unfortunately until we have some concrete projections,funding and bringing the ore to market plans this share (like all prospect mining shares with Hugh potential) will be controlled by the short termers who will move their funds on to the next "in" share.As long as they can make their 10% they are happy soles
Hopefully one day the right news will drop and the short termers will loose out big time .
Expecting short termers to pile into HZM next week as PFS is due in October

RY will have to produce something soon like the PFS so he can tap Riverfort for some more dosh to pay his salary.
Feel very little down by more broken promises -where is the media week we were promised

Once again it appears RY has been leading the long term shareholders down the garden path.
What has happened to the media week and the game changing news or does these events only exist in a parallel universe or RYs head.
Never mind back to sleep for another few years.
Re time right place maybe?
Truthful CEO maybe not?

£134 million equates to circa 20p plus per share-based on uncertainty and investment opportunities elsewhere sure many would-5 times current shareprice

Agree-R.Y should stop making positive statements and making pledges that never come to fruition-it is not good for shareholder confidence-better not to say anything than continually mislead the shareholders

Regarding -"the cheeky offer"-it would have done no harm to have disclosed the amount.
What R.Y considered "cheeky" could have been a healthy amount to many.
40p/50p would have been a handsome rewarded for those invested at circa 10p at the time.
What is the shareprice now ?and where is the exiting news we are keep being promised-the P.F.S for example and this alleged investor week as promised

If there is a bid for Amur it should be put to the shareholders and the size of R.Y's shareholding should not be relevant-his small shareholding can be said to reflect his lack of confidence in the project.
Unfortunately if there was a bid approach R.Y might turn it down without telling the shareholder's in self interest-remember he hinted there was a bid approach upon the granting of the licence but he turned it down without disclosing the amount.
Remember at the time the shareprice spiked to 40p plus-I beleive the bid was in the region of 50p-a very good payout for the shareholders but not in R.Y's interest

Hope for once RY keeps his promises and stick to deadlines-based on the past I am not confident and the cynic in me tells me that RY's latest comments are just to help Riverfort churn their shares

simonthezeaolot you are absolutely correct.
Yesterday we had people saying that Glencore do not develop green sites based on historic statements.
Glencore is a dynamic company and will adapt it's policies as market conditions change to maximise profits and hence shareholder value.
Glencore will not sit on this vast resource-it will ever be developed or sold.
Successful pellet results will be the first number in the combination to the safe that will unlock the true value of the project

Have not posted on this share but have a holding just short of seven figures.
Glencore primary aim is to make profits for it's shareholders and it makes no sense for Glencore to sit on this site for years when it can generate billions of profits over the years.
The project will ever be sold at a very healthy profit (allowing Glencore to finance projects elsewhere ) or it will be brought into production under Glencore's supervision.
All successful companies are flexible and do not stick to things they have said in the past if it is detrimental to it's profits and shareholders profits.
A dynamic company will always react to changes in market conditions and demand
Thanks to Minorminer,Tomshare and others for their great research

Hope there is some substance to Mr Young's latest hints on the podcast and it is not just a ploy to help Riverfort off load their latest share allocation.

Agree RY has treated the long term shareholders with utter contempt since the licence was granted with wonga style finance deals,broken promises.and missed deadlines.
This is reflected in the dismal shareprice and the lack of serious institutional investors

Agree with you ManuelDexterity
The use of this word and similar has no place on a company share discussion board

Oilheadgame-you state RY -" He is doing what's best as he has been captain for many more years etc"
I beleive as certain Captain Smith of the Titanic thought "he was doing what's best" just before the ship hit the iceberg.