RE: Deal22 Mar 2025 07:48
Not to sure I can put your mind at rest Dick. Concerning the Triton FPSO I have no information other than whats been released on damage and the extent of repair. Whilst information is sensitive, Dana and Serica should indulge their shareholders with the reason for delay to repair, the restoration of the 2nd Compressor and any shortening of the summer maintenance period.
With regard to FPSO in the UK sector, I can name a few I was involved in that put them offline for months:
Gryphon FPSO - storm damage put the field offline for over a year whilst moorings/risers repaired
Scheihallion FPSO - offloading tanker overun and damaged the Oil Export Hose Reel on stern of FPSO, offline for 2 months whilst reparations took place.
Triton FPSO - Production Riser damaged on installation - embarrassing replacement for Amerada Hess at the time which took months
So you can see that unfortunately these things happen.
Interestingly the Neo Global Producer III on the Dumbarton Field is older than Triton as is the Anasuria FPSO on the Anasuria Field.
With regard to Tailwind, I was also against the deal and voted accordingly. I remonstrated at the time of Mr Flegg joining Serica and could only conclude he was a pal. I accepted that ACW at his age was bowing out, but I wonder now whether either of them kept any of their free shares in the company but offloaded prior to Tailwind.
Unfortunately we have a "whats good for the Directors" vying against "whats good for the Company". This time round we don't have Directors at Serica with substantial share holdings but on the other hand we have Mercuria and Mr & Mrs Hardy - honestly Dick, I was happy with my dividend here at my age and am unsure as to what will transpire here. With regard to JOG its good to see a recovery in the sp, mayhaps an inkling to future success with Buchan.