Member Info for Moljen

1981 - hope you had gander at NIO when you were telling me to look at AML. AML since then looks like down a few % and NIO up around 50% so hope you broadened your horizons and made a few quid..
See, I'm not biased and always just negative on stock - if it looks good I'll say so and if it doesn't I'll also say so. Unfortunately PREM is and remains a POS so my opinion on it remains a POS. Another one for you if you want a miner which after a long while should be getting ready to rerate is HUM.

Perhaps we need a BOGOF offer on share purchases here - mind you not even too sure that'd be the best buying opportunity over the coming months.
Only thing held in lower regard than the BOD is the totally unrealistic and consistently incorrect analysis provided by the twitter ramp brigade.7's on the menu for today or tomorrow by the looks of it but that's hardly surprising for anyone with two grey cells to rub together.

Mal, just heard on the QT that Prem haven't actually got round to doing the painting yet .... it was just another rumour put out by GR. Only trades you need to know about are another 32M offloaded today on top of last weeks.
Think Acker was playing with the gullible who either come out or endorse the carp from the ramp side, plain to see no interest in this company and resultant share price trend

And so another wonderful week in the life of Prem begins. Wonder what the desperately need this to succeed brigade will come up with this week and totally read wrong after last weeks follow the money and such like when they don't understand a T20 rollover for the 115M trades.
Here's a hint thus far based on today's trades still absolutely SFA interest in Prem by the market and working really hard to offload all the confetti already in the pipeline. Expected news? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .... reasons to buy none.

See we had lots of this morning and to watch the trades as they'd foretell great things about to occur. Well absolutely nothing, nada, zilch indeed more of the same with the pesky bot churning away and a few 1M sales and a missing (late reporting) trade fro seems to be circa 6M.
Fuzzy wuzzy doesn't cut it here anymore I'm afraid and the UT at 9:05 suggests no leaks just more BS from those desperate to see this increase in price, ah well can always try the EPO Gazette ramp tomorrow boys and girls .
Acker, you just being mischievous with earlier posts as nothing I can see suggests now is the time to buy in?

You mean he made an accusation that this might be a lifestyle company and a bit of a scam as compared to just being run incredibly incompetently. Shades of grey if you ask me, however all irrelevant as he was spot on as to the price action over the last 5 years. Personally I'd rather make money than have a moral high ground but if you prefer losing and taking that stance please be my guest nobody is stopping you.

For those that missed it we had the pleasure of a visit today by Crazy, unfortunately somebody who obviously didn't take any notice of one of the most accurate posters on Prem ever, has gone running to Admin and he's gone again. Anyway, Crazy's current take on the situation is it's still a POS and who am I to argue with somebody with a 100% accurate track record.

Don't seem to have missed much whilst out in the fields, what we looking at 0.079 to buy and 0.0765 to sell so another little nudge downwards and maybe 15M off loaded so only another half billion or so to go. Suggests tomorrow or day after will be 0.0725-0.0775 continuing our recent downward trend of 22.5% every week and a half. No news on MNH production or off take agreement so another 24 hours closer to being unable to avoid dilution D-Day. Got to be a fair chance of the 6's this week & after that where's the floor's the limit for our falling dead cat.I'd say a warm welcome back to Crazy but let's see a bit more posting history before deciding whether it's the genuine article or just an imposter. For myself, hope it's the genuine article as they had this down as a POS well before the likes of me so their insights would be welcome.

Oooh we have a second trade, twice the size of the first but at a lower price. Trying hard to find a positive in those facts but struggling, it is what it is. Is there nobody apart from 2 people prepared to put their hands in their pockets and buy some shares in Prem at the moment? Says it all really.

Acker - still looks like one real trade only so far today. Spread been played about with, suggests having to work really hard to find buyers would tend to confirm view of lack of interest and investors. Potentially a perfect storm brewing if there is any need for working capital .... your a lot of time and work could be an understatement if the off take agreement doesn't get reviewed to the company's benefit. IMO they're struggling to get it signed off

Eddie, I don't ask them to so you'd better ask them. Whilst you're at it perhaps ask yourself as you seem to be doing what you're actually complaining about. Strange.

Morning Mal, actually been a pretty useful board this morning with things appertaining to Prem discussed by all in a pleasant manner. And then we have you .... they're trolls and not invested.
Well done for getting the best waste of space post of the day thus far, at least Jonjo is giving an opinion and why whereas your post was pointless, worthless and meaningless.

Hi Acker, do Jonjo posts remind you of answers you used to get from a certain PR person employed (still is I'm sure) by Prem with initials FS?
About the same level of understanding and wheeled out by Prem when they didn't like the hard questions and provided them with a degree of plausible deniability IMO

Jonjo - you're still not understanding the difference between Non Exec and Exec positions. The day to day running of IRR is undertaken by VM not NH and at Prem it's GR not NH.
On your thinking NH is full time running IRR so just how is he also going to be full time running Prem? If it's not a FT job then why have we shelled out well over $2M to GR over teh years for a FT job if it isn't one? Can't you see the mess your fuddled understanding creates?

MW - no, our confetti has more urgent and pressing needs

Jesus Jonjo your lack of knowledge as to what you are invested in is staggering. So NH is leading IRR? No he's not IRR have a CEO - Vincent Mascolo, Chief Executive Officer of IronRidge
Just confirms you have no idea of the difference between Non Exec and Exec appointments and what they do, likewise on Off Take agreements.
Scary, really

At the time of negotiations Jonjo? Are they concluded or something, have we moved to a committed off take agreement. Must have missed that RNS.
Another hint Jonjo in nearly an hour of trading we've had one real trade for just over 1M shares (peanuts) the rest appear to be the pesky bot.
If the MNH project was nailed down and financed you'd be seeing a hell of a lot more, it isn't and each day the market is trusting less and less it ever will be

Jonjo whilst you re learning the difference between uncommitted and committed off take agreements why don't you ad a second bit of research and research the difference between Non Exec and Exec positions within Company. We do not have a new chairman, we have an existing Non Exec Director who is still a Non Exec Director but now called a Non Executive Chairman.

Jonjo, little exercise for you and probably a worthwhile one for all who don't understand off take agreements. Have a little research and find out the difference between an uncommitted and a committed off take agreement.
One is rather loose and a short term financing option without much backing or reliability and the other isn't - did none of you wonder why the word uncommitted was in the RNS?

Classic blinkering in two posts there Jonjo - we won't know until it's RNS'd by GR when it comes to MNH financials / production but in the post before despite no RNS you say the Off Take is real.
Talking about changing your tune to suit!