We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
VOD could easily make the investment if they stopped wasting cash on divs. It’s up to the shareholders if they want to milk it now till it’s dry, or build for a future.
But it's also possible he is correct. VOD is not safe as houses.
So interest rate lolops on to 7%, the market demands a 5% risk excess for holding VOD so div yield needs to be 12%. VOD cut the div in half. SP is 33p.
It can happen. There is always risk. Not selling doesn't magically protect you from losing money. That's just a gamblers fallacy.
Both are big and worthwhile to society. Question is can VOD capitalise on a 5g boom without doing a VOD.
Not sure how you can define VOD as the best div out there. 12 month return including 2 dividends, minus 37.13%
You must consider total returns to consider which the best is.
Or just maybe not enough buyers. Now why would that be?
I don't see this joke stock market. Maybe I am just in the right stocks. Not VOD of course.
And there is the problem. Underground too expensive, open pit not possible over such a large area. They can only possibly maybe get permission for an open pit in a small concentrated area, so why are they drilling all over clontibret.
That permission will also be years away if at all, so not sure where the end of year date is coming from.
VOD's own share of UK market will deliberately shrink to offload some debt. Market is not so excited therefore. €11bn more needed to invest. More debt probably.
Renaissance Tech sold off 2.91m ADR's to reduce their holding in the quarter. Selling not buying.
Why is this transformative year different to the 10 that have gone before it?
I seem to remember them having a similar plan, VOD 2016 they called it or something. Cut cost, reduce staff, sell assets, to keep paying div.
Didn’t really work then.
There always was. Being allowed to dig up clontibret to get at it is the unknown.
No plan for a mine, no interest here.
Expect a bumpy ride. VOD is likely to suffer in the coming us debt ceiling liquidity drain. Big money will be selling and avoiding div only stocks in favour of loading up on the trillion dollars of t-bills about to be unleashed.
The comments not so fun!
Well OK, everyone who bought since Oct 2011 is underwater including divs, and a gaggle of folk who bought from Sept 1999 to Sept 2000.
Divs that don't come from genuinely excess capital don't work.
"It's only a dog of you timed your entry wrong"
So everyone who has bought since Nov 1997?
Probably why all of them have made poor market lagging returns last 20 years including divs. Too much debt is a bad thing. Paying divs instead of paying off your debt is bad for investors long term, they just can't see it, or don't want to.
The debt is just a big anchor now that is forcing them to do things the market clearly does not like.
Selling prime assets and shrinking market share with a JV that only exists as they can’t make necessary investments on their own, due to too much debt already.
I'm curious, after 3 years of me droning on here about debt and divs, do long term believers still think paying out divs and doing buybacks is a good strategy for the cash is does generate?
This seems to still be the strategy. How long does it fail for before it changes? 10 year total return including dividends is -11%.
The market will pay for growth and NVDA has an eye watering amount of it. VOD does not, hence the valuations.
VOD are issuing €1.5bn new notes to pay off max 325m USD. Debt reduction does not appear to be a thing.
Waiting for update on issues to do with the hybrid euro bond to recycle.
It’s all so 2009. Collecting a div while you wait for recovery in London property market.
WKP was a safe place to wait last time and remain well managed to do it again, with a resilient trading model and no carbuncle buildings on the books to drag them under.