Member Info for Mitch984

Can we stop this pointless hammering of anyone who posts anything that is not a clear ramp? Degsy and Minor's responses to Havoc's post about us all being realistic were both out of order. Anyone invested here obviously has (very) high hopes for this share. I certainly do. However nobody has come up with a satisfactory explanation as to why the share price is stuck around the 13p mark when it has such potential. I do not in any way accept that the reason is that Zioc is "under the radar". The professional investment market employs literally thousands of knowledgeable people to seek out opportunities just like this. My other concern is that one of the largest original shareholders (Artemis Trust) have been selling down their holding on a regular basis since before the permit announcement. That is why virtually every buy order, large or small, has been able to be filled even with such a relatively small number of shares in issue. It worries me that such a large shareholder, who must know far more about Zioc's prospects than we do, have been (and still are) willing to sell their shares at 11p to 21p if serious multiples of those prices are on the horizon. The only explanation I have seen for this is that the Trust may have had a tax bill to settle. However that would not explain why they (or one of the other large shareholders) have continued selling down their holding month after month. Before I get jumped on, I am not deramping. I am very heavily invested here and agree 100% that all the fundamentals are present for us all to do extremely well long term. However I don't like the way anyone who posts anything that doesn't support the golden rainbow is ridiculed or accused of deramping. This is meant to be a discussion forum after all. I would be very happy to hear Degsy or Minor's views on the reason for the current low share price and on why every buy order since Artemis started selling pre-permit has been met.

Perhaps BluTony would like to comment now after his months of incessant ramping and his quite insulting at times comments to Dave and others? Anything to say BluTony?

Tony, 2018 may well be the year of Blockchain, but you are being very badly misled if you truly think 2018 is going to be the year of Milestone or Black Cactus. I hope you have investments in other Blockchain companies with more solid backgrounds and potential, as you will make no money in 2018 (or further forward) on these two dead ducks. The MSG traders who have disappeared the past few weeks have all sold out because they have done their research on the people behind both these companies.

This would be hilarious if it wasn't so concerning. There is not a single person now associated with either Black Cactus or Milestone who has any kind of verifiable business history, or technology experience, or is part of a company that has had any significant past sales income

Quote "For current services performed MNU has been compensated twenty three hundred dollars for news coverage of the current press release issued by Black Cactus Global by a non-affiliated third party." So Market News Update were paid by Black Cactus for this news release.

But what has this got to do with Milestone and Black Cactus? Surely you aren't seriously suggesting either company could compete with the Vezt start up when Vezt already have $5 million in funding, the support of several major artists, and founders with many years of music industry experience. Compare that will MSG/Black Cactus with no funding, no artist support, and absolutely zero music biz experience. I really do not think anything related to music is anywhere in their plans, although at the moment nobody has any clear idea what plans Black Cactus or Milestone have. Absolutely nothing they have announced to date can be substantiated by actual facts.

Anyone who has invested in MSG should read this link, and specifically the paragraph I have copied/pasted below. It very clearly explains the risk you are taking with MSG. That does NOT mean that you will not make money from your investment, and it is not a criticism of anyone who holds MSG shares. It just very clearly explains the ultimate downside. As long as you understand that downside and you are investing money that you can afford to lose, then any digs Dave has had at any of you are not really relevant. Its not a share for me, but I do wish good luck to all shareholders. Quote from SEC warning:- Specifically, the group warned investors to be wary about any publicly traded stocks that boast having a connection to blockchain. It stated in a release last month that "it's easy for companies or their promoters to make glorified claims about new products, services and other cryptocurrency-related connections," noting that the tactic could be deployed by would-be fraudsters.

Blutony. I have just realised that this comment was aimed at me as I was visiting family in Bmouth when I posted recently. Firstly, I am NOT Dave - so do not take out your anger on me. Secondly I consider your post that I "need to be careful" and "knock on door" as a personal threat, and have reported same to the LSE admin. I have no idea why you are taking matters so personally unless you are financially desperate for the MSG share price to rise so you can recover your losses. Even so, there is absolutely no need to make personal threats against any poster. That is not what this board is supposed to be about. I will leave the rest to the board's admin.

Tony Sanders' entire past experience is in the broadband, VoIP, telephone systems field - which is absolutely nothing to do with Blockchain or developing apps.

Dave - I would suggest that you just leave them to it and come back here in six months when the situation will be obvious to all. If Bluetony wants to waste his money just because he sees the word "blockchain" mentioned in a RNS, then let him. And Bluetony, regarding the disparaging remark you made about my previous post - my cat did not invest in MSG. My nephew did. Even my cat has enough intelligence not to invest in this smoke and mirrors set up at this time. In respect of your unfair negative remarks about Debbie - her emphasis was always on the Passion Project area of MSG, an area in which she/MSG did their best. She, nor indeed anyone at MSG, ever had any expertise in apps or Blockchain - and that is still the case even after Debbie's departure.

While I accept that Dave goes over the top with his number of posts, everything he has pointed out about Milestone, Envoy, Black Cactus etc has been based on checkable facts. I have seen nothing positive from other posters (like Bluetony) that is anything other than speculation based on their gut feelings about possible blockchain developements. My feeling is that Dave's comments need to be here so that inexperiences investors (and there are many on AIM) are prompted to do their own research before diving in. Take out Dave and Polly's posts and all you have left are enthusiastic comments about the potential of this company based on RSNs - RSNs that Dave has already proved to be meaningless and inaccurate. I am not personally invested here, but I do have a young relative who invested a substantial part of his life savings in MSG based on the same hype that I have read from some posters here. If he was thinking of investing now, then Dave's comments and reasearch would have given him the background to make a much more considered decision. That is why I consider Dave's post (although there are too many) to be valuable - to help and assist potential new and inexperienced investors. My relative, by the way, has already written off in his mind the money he invested in MSG. He realises now he was very foolish as he is concerned that the entire web of companies might be just smoke and mirrors to make quick money for the directors. Time will tell of course. Hopefully he is wrong and he will eventually be able to recover his investment. But, in the meantime, what is wrong with pushing potential new investors into doing their own research?