Member Info for misty12

I appreciate that Jim. My point is “who knows”

But it certainly looks like that to me.

Maybe they think they can do a better job than Pete, not hard let’s face it. Maybe they will sell on to another bigger company or maybe just accept the private revenue stream not answerable to shareholders .

There hasn't been a results of the strategic review RNS. There was a denial sentence to delisting granted but will have absolutely no consequence if they delist.

Pantheon may want to delist for any number of reasons, google is your friend Jim, but I'm sure you have already looked.

If you don't think they will delist, that's fair enough and you have nothing to worry about. Like I say just imo

Another step towards private ownership and de listing imo

The deterrent of a RNS misdemeanour becomes irrelevant after delisting.

All imo but pretty clear

I will don't worry.

Another populist post lol. I'd far rather listen to vander all day long than the blind Pete lovers on here!! many many of which have been wrong for more than 10 years. Remember Dr Maccers (a real doctor? lol) saying M23 are nothing to worry about lol.

If you are not bothered or concerned about SL update then you need to give your head a wobble

Mike-have you heard yourself lately. This has been an absolute pos for more than a decade and you're chirping on about a SP of 2.5p!!

MC cap is looking way to top heavy and that's with the lowly share price thanks to the colossal dilution over the years.

DR- classy as ever with the name calling. Real big man

Talking of rent free Ian and Mike

Why does it bother you

Linton - pmsl that made me laugh

And Pete wants creditability.

I actually think the market reaction to Pete stepping down would be massive such is the level of distrust

Only if you believe the head line figures. Market does not.

Share price in excess of 90p. Perspective

MikeGP/IanB/ GIBo or who ever you are get a grip lol

Why not address the points made by Akon rather than just attack the poster.

It's exactly what you all do, multi ID Rampers pmsl

Never believe a word he says.

Its much easier

Get a grip ffs

I'm sorry Gibbo, I was expecting a meaningful report available for shareholders not a a one paragraph RNS saying "its complete".

There again this is WSG after all.

As long as you find that acceptable then that's great. After all you must be down a terrific amount here by now yet still you protect the inept BOD

One trade in two days and a spread of 20% all down to very poor liquidity.

Remember this?

"Due to the Company's share-price concerns, the perceived current lack of liquidity, the cost of capital and ongoing listing costs; concerns which are shared by many listed companies of various sizes, the Board is undertaking a strategic review on how to improve shareholder value. The results of this review will be communicated to shareholders in due course."

Any news?

Vander; Don't let a good story get in the way.....

Meanwhile, that was a very weak book at the close.

Actually I was thinking more around some of the head line figures that were contracts.eg Ferry and tema 1.

Patience is a virtue, and hopefully it will pay off one day for you.

I think its very much which camp you are in AIMing. If you believe the head line figures of the RNS or you look at history and see that every one of those figures has been hopelessly inaccurate.

Market seems to agree with the latter

Dear me, classy as usual.

Just as long as we agree your posts continue to mislead Dr