We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Well B, that's why I think more and more people should be questioning the Nomad.
Think this is WSG second?
Some where along the line the Nomad must (even though they are all bent) ask some serious questions of what they are being fed, after all they should be protecting the shareholders, as well as lining their own pockets. Together with the Legal Advisor they must take more responsibility IMO
Until there is more Due Diligence and actual policing, the corrupt cancer that freely spreads through AIM will continue.
The demise of the all SEAQ listings was a start, but there's a long way to go
only needed if they sign a contract says Pete. What happened to the money for the previous signings that just went on capex.
Careful believing dear Pete if i were you Reece. Remember the "I won't use Darwin" one?
Morning AIMING; yes I'd concede the buying had a part to play but along with twitter. You have to ask was that coordinated as well wouldn't you?
"but the problem with this BB is 95% of posters are perma-bears or bulls, so their advice can be largely ignored."
Spot on, post rec
So WSG issue a profit warning RNS and then buy shares. If that's not smelly I don't know what is.
This is going up on twitter commentary (usual suspects) that will be selling as mugs buy.
Be very careful is all I'm saying. Make money whilst you can and its sometimes very easy with dogs on AIM to do just that.