Member Info for milnrowmug

Take it easy Heid, s/he is right that posters jump in and predict explosion on every upward market fluctuation. Thing is, though, one day they'll be right. Till then just yawn and enjoy the day. Regarding testicular endowment, maybe we can discuss this at the £10 party.

Cynde, sure consolidation was OK for us, but often has not been for others.

MrI, yep, true, yawn some more.

"Never traded..... , daft me," well, maybe, too early to call. I have traded, yummy profit, no complaints:BUT there can be a big N lurch here, and there might not be time to buy back in. Yours might be best in the end. We shall see, hopefully fun times ahead, gla.

Seems to have been removed; anyone any idea why? Was it a whole thread?

Note that while up 12.5% on the day, they are down on 2m ago, which we are not.

Haha, wouldn't be the first: still, glad I got some more yesterday.

RB@B,maybe you should have sold some, then bought back in dips. Wolf, yeah, not as if he had any track record of that sort of thing.

Tyb, if you're right, anyone who doesn't like the content of a thread need only add some nastiness to get it all removed? Top team, LonSouE!

Smart idea, I'm certainly impressed; but then my chemistry didn't reach A-level.

Agreed LonSouE underpowered, things crash, and are unavailable for short or long periods. This morning's 7am RNSs weren't on until after 8. Get what you pay for, it's free, other sites are available.

Hey, if that good, wish I'd seen them.

Cheap as *hi*s?

He only announces updates he wants us to believe.

Although, for completeness, I read somewhere they are only going for 20%max hydrogen, so I guess the petroleum gas burners will cope unreconverted. Only 20% less carbon emissions; but, as Tesco says.....

Capex I broadly agree with you. Still need to know lessons learned. Stable doors which can't be bolted first MUST be after. Someone didn't prevent this.

Chugg, when I see a pointless or possibly paid basher of prem, I don't attack them: nor do I accept their view unless intelligent and evidence-based, which few ever are. I reflect that if I had been deterred from this a few years back, whether with facts or lies, I'd be wealthier now. The resources are good, but I need to be partly loyal to my "investment", yet realistic. Gla.

f15j, there is a pandemic on. While demand for product may improve in lockdown; everything else is just more difficult.

But, as I said, what's that to UJO?

Yes it was hydrogen typically over 50%, CH4 over 25%, CO over 5%, less other hydrocarbons: even less some gases CO2, nitrogen, which would exit unburnt. While these latter would reduce calorific yield, hydrogen is so light that the yield per volume (rather than mass; it was sold per cu.ft.) must be less.

Like petroleum "natural" gas the composition was variable, but there were no valuable byproducts to justify refining coal gas, unlike the other alkanes in "natural" gas.

The proportion of hydrogen made the gas so buoyant, that schoolboys could inflate condoms (not so-named then) and they would stick firmly to a school hall ceiling. With the new gas they were much less buoyant, and would sometimes drift down during assemblies, an improvement in our view.

#had to, not has.

I recall that, to the end of the 60s, homes and businesses received mains gas which was mostly hydrogen. To change to one which was mostly methane, all appliances has to be "converted" with different burner jets. I therefore assume a large proportion of hydrogen could not be re-introduced without re-conversion.

However, what's that to UJO?

Don't know where they goy that 2% from, but different sites sometimes give duff/different data.

& grappa, that wasn't really a helpful thread title, if witty.