Member Info for MCNol

Agreed @Stan9, they are not "high level" they are worried Gamblers (who do not and never will own the asset) that are so concerned they will lose their bets that they spend their days and nights posting crap here. Clearly they have little else to do of an evening...and no knowledge of investing in an AIM stock.

@Blubay, when the Trolls come to your defence even you should realise that there is a problem...

@Blubay, had you considered keeping the goalposts static, you move them around so much you make people dizzy. Had you considered that might be the reason you have no Followers and are rarely "Recommended" ?

@Blubay, congratulations on demonstrating what a "bulletin board special" is... it takes a few crumbs of technical truth from the February 15 RNS and bakes them into a very misleading pie...

Blubay just stated the board "weren't able to prevent dilution" and concentrations "diminished." Helium concentrations actually increased compared to the 2024 results. During the 2024 EWT, concentrations were 4.7%. During the 2026 ESP test, the well produced a sustained average of 5.4% helium, with a peak of 9.2%...

Far from being "diluted" to a failure, the helium concentration remained robust and higher than previous benchmarks, even with the massive six-fold increase in water flow (up to 16,400 bpd)...

Blubay just stated the pump was set "short of its target" and was "nearer to the upper boundary." The Electrical Submersible Pump was set at 1,061m MD, which is within the fractured Basement...

Blubay just stated they haven't said if concentrations were "sporadic." The February 15 RNS explicitly used the words "The ESP has successfully demonstrated a six‑fold increase in flow rate... with sustained levels of helium concentrations at surface." This is the opposite of "sporadic."

Blubay just stated they "tried to isolate" the basement but failed. The goal of the ESP test was to see if the well could be pumped at high rates and what would happen to the Gas-Water Ratio. The lower GWR (0.05 Sm3/Sm3) wasn't an "engineering challenge" they failed to solve; it was the primary data point they were trying to measure to understand the reservoir's scale.

Don't fall for it Peeps, more FUD from a serial offender...

....and as if by magic one such person presents themselves in order to illustrate my point.

It’s a fascinating spectacle, isn’t it? Imagine a grown adult, presumably with a tax code and a pair of sensible shoes, deciding that their primary contribution to the 2026 global economy is to squat on a stock bulletin board like a digital gargoyle, spitting 98% unrefined tripe into the void.

It’s a hobby that suggests a tragic Venn diagram where "Too Much Free Time" overlaps perfectly with "Short Position Desperation" and "A Pathological Need for Negative Social Power." They aren't just posters; they’re "Vindictive Trolls" in the wild, likely scoring a perfect four-out-of-four on the Dark Tetrad—narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and a touch of sadism just for the seasoning.

While the rest of the world is busy with, say, dental appointments or grocery shopping, these dedicated "bashers" are working overtime to manufacture a self-fulfilling prophecy, hoping that if they type "Fundraising Imminent" enough times, the universe will finally reward their commitment to misinformation with a 0.01p drop in the bid price. It’s less of a financial strategy and more of a cry for help disguised as market analysis, the digital equivalent of shouting at a pigeon because it didn't give you its crust of bread.

The "scattergun" and "tax-offset" narratives are technically incoherent within the framework of institutional equity capital markets. The £3.5 million institutional subscription on 26 March was a primary market private placement; such transactions require a deliberate mandate and rigorous due diligence, which is functionally antithetical to a "scattergun" or passive tracking strategy.

Furthermore, a circa 10% equity stake (e.g., abrdn) denotes a high-conviction discretionary holding, not a pro-rata index weighting.

From a fiscal perspective, the "tax-loss harvesting" argument is a logical fallacy: institutional performance is measured on net alpha and total return; incurring a 100% capital loss to achieve a marginal corporate tax offset is a net-destructive strategy that violates fiduciary duty.

The "tracker fund" narrative is technically fallacious as it ignores the fundamental distinction between passive replication and active discretionary mandates within the AIM ecosystem. Helium One resides in the FTSE AIM All-Share, an index with negligible pure passive ETF density; the presence of Tier-1 institutions like abrdn (9.8%) represents high-conviction, active positioning rather than involuntary pro-rata weighting.

Furthermore, the £3.5 million institutional subscription on 26 March 2026 constituted a primary market transaction, an elective deployment of risk capital that is mechanically impossible for a tracker fund, which is restricted to secondary market liquidity for index rebalancing.

Consequently, the 31.2% institutional block serves as a verified endorsement of the transition to 24/7 continuous operations at Galactica, providing structural bid-side support that retail-only floats lack.

Institutions ("Whales") that hold HE1 shares...

abrdn (Aberdeen)~9.8% in abrdn UK Smaller Companies / Ethical Equity Funds

Cantor Fitzgerald Europe 6.90%, Institutional Proprietary / Market Maker Vehicle

Barclays Bank PLC 3.91% in Barclays Wealth / Smart Investor Fund

Credo Capital 3.66% in Credo Global Equity / HNW Private Wealth

HE1 Employee Benefit Trust 3.18% in Internal Operational Trust

The institutional register for Helium One has recently transitioned into a more stable "Production Phase" configuration, anchored by abrdn and Cantor Fitzgerald. While the retail-led nominee accounts (HL, II) still dominate over 50% of the daily liquidity, the presence of Legal & General and Fidelity indicates that the company is appearing on the radar of mainstream UK index and smaller-cap funds...

I see the kids have not gone back to school yet...

It is interesting you use the phrase "thick and heavy"...

You can repeat yourself 100 times a day @TheTripleStar, it does not make what you are saying true. This is HE1 chat board, not Rift (who are yet to list) so give it a rest...

There you go again, making things up...

No well adjusted person would want to show such a lack of integrity in public.

Did your Mother ignore you as a child @Kread, is that why you constantly seek attention on here?

A successful placing (especially when upsized due to demand, as seen with the WRAP retail offer) acts as a third-party audit. Large institutions do not invest millions of pounds unless their due diligence confirms the commercial viability of assets like the ITW-1 discovery.

By diluting today, the company secured the ability to sell helium trailers at £126,000 – £151,000 gross revenue per trailer. This creates a self-sustaining loop where future dilution becomes unnecessary.

All right Sweetie, hit a nerve...how funny.

Until next week all ....

More attention seeking I see, pipe down....the Lady doth protest too much!

Have a great weekend all genuine investors, see you next week.

If you think that @Kread why do you post everyday here? Attention seeker, Troll or Gambler on CFD's? Or maybe all three?

You seem to have forgotten the world has lost at least 30% of its supply since that time @Kread....try to keep up!

Todays prices for a trailer full of Helium is £126,242 – £151,491.

Renergen...