Riverfort29 Oct 2020 11:13
My previous posts have gone as I asked LSE to remove them. I made some accusations and connections that tried to make sense of the falling share price, but what is clear, having spent quite a lot of time researching this more thoroughly, including engaging directly with Riverfort, that I got things completely wrong and made connections that not only had no basis in fact, but do not exist. This post aims to set the record straight.
From my analysis and engagement, I would like to make clear that, in my opinion, Riverfort acted in a professional, ethical and transparent manner with respect to Live Company. They funded the acquisition of Bright Bricks and supported Live Company through a difficult period with additional capital. From further analysis of their trading of the ESA shares they represented a minimal amount of trading compared to overall trading, reported their trades to Live Company and were very accommodating when Live Company asked them to not trade. I believe without Riverfort's funding, Live Company may not have existed today as it would not have completed the acquisition of the Bright Brick assets without financial support from Riverfort.