RE: Getting back to revenue generation10 Oct 2021 09:11
The big touring assets command some extremely good rental rates. Those will always be commercially confidential to each client as it depends on the size of the tour, popularity, and season (and no company in their right mind would tell you exactly how much each client is charged). There are two separate independent research notes (extracts below) giving the value. Then look at the 2021 Q1 revenue for touring sets of ÂŁ250k which was basically 3 months rental at Naples Zoo and Brickosaurs Israel which shows that their big touring sets even in offseason command between ÂŁ40/50k a month.
As to dropping further when the Fe deferment is RNS’ed its already dropped 15/20% on that rumour. Bear in mind that the share price never rose when Fe was announced in the first place, so even by AIM standards that’s harsh. Ultimatly depends on what they include in the actual announcement.
SP Angel research note: https://www.livecompanygroup.com/pdfs/LVCG_Initiation_05112020.pdf
Solid Economics and Payback: The average cost of one of the larger touring set of assets, for example the Ocean tour with over 25 models, is about £300,000 and takes about 3 months to complete. Once the models are in production, the touring schedule can begin to be established. We estimate that an average exhibit term is about 3 months and generates revenue of ~£100,000-150,000 with gross margins of about 80%. This implies a cash payback period of 2-3 average term (3 months) bookings, or 7 to 9 months overall. Understandably, not all tours are booked for every month of a year, particularly when shipping times, and cleaning/maintenance may be required between shows. However, optimisation of a tour’s travel itinerary can result in significant profitability for LVCG, particularly for those higher demand tours.
Shard Capital Research Note: https://www.livecompanygroup.com/pdfs/LVCG-Shard-research%5B1%5D.pdf
The economics of touring assets
The economics of the Zoo touring assets are highly compelling. A large set of assets typically takes three months to build and costs around ÂŁ300,000, of which steel, which provides the core support of the structures, represents almost half. Specialist bricks, not necessarily held in stock at Bright Bricks, also represent another significant cost, with around 4,000 different types of bricks used to create the Zoo assets. Assuming a theoretical 100% asset utilisation, which cannot be achieved in practise, each set of touring assets could yield up to an estimated ÂŁ600,000 of revenue per annum at peak rates and a gross profit, at an 80% margin, of ÂŁ480,000. This equates to an annual return on investment of 160% and a cash payback of seven and a half months. In reality, given the need to move these assets between locations, with cleaning and any routine maintenance also required, 100% asset utilisation is impossible to achieve. However with high demand and careful planning, asset utilisation rates of at least nine months are perfectly feasible