Understanding the recent Placing7 Jul 2020 14:41
I can now see a rationale for NM doing this placing and extending it to $41 million:
1 BHP and Newcrest were excluded, so if either is a potential bidder, it reduces their holdings to sub 13%
2 Looking at those Market Screener figures, I cannot believe Fidelity, Bell Potter and Bank of Singapore are nominee holders for PIs in this case... I think it is much more likely that these are on behalf of three individual prospective bidders, or maybe even one, but spread around...
Hence the urgency for NM to get a load of drilling done on prospects potentially 'bigger than Alpala'....
I don't believe there is a remote hope of SOLG taking this to production. Its now about getting the highest exit price and as somebody else has said, SOLG looks like a 'sitting duck' right now.
What we urgently need is the FN signoff (and ideally indications of up to $1 billion offtake funding); and
A steady flow of drill results...
Otherwise I would have to revise my takeout price PRE October down to 40/45p...
A hostile bidder only needs 50% acceptances to make an offer unconditional. BHP+Newcrest+Fidelity+Bell Potter+CGP+Bank of Singapore adds up to 61%; without Newcrest its 48%.
So ironically we may now need to count on getting to October and BHP making a bid to get decent value.
Otherwise it could come down to how much profit these 'outside' holders are prepared to take...for a few weeks work, they may be happy to sell at 30p or so...
So we really need an auction and lets hope those three 'rogue' holdings are three different predators...
AIMHO as usual...