RE: Re Last week's Mining Journal article21 Mar 2022 08:34
Sorry fat thumbs...
We need to determine our collective position on the following:
What would be our reaction to a bid for Cascabel alone and at what price would that be undervalued (NPV was $4.2/4.5bn but probably higher in Q2)?
Should such an offer be put to shareholders and if the Board tried to make it a done deal, how could we challenge that, given that it would not be a bud for the company, risking us having no say.
The latter is particularly concerning because the current share price massively undervalues Cascabel alone, let alone the other jewels we have.
Indeed that means there is effectively no value, indeed a negative value placed on Porvenir, Rio, etc.
And that is the nub of my concern especially for a bid for Cascabel alone...even more so if the Board agreed it, because as soon as it was formally agreed, it massively reduces the possibility of a third party bidding a proper price or at all for the rump of SOLG, leaving the way clear for BHP to gobble us up lock stock and barrel for maybe as little as 60/80p depending on the initial agreed bid for Cascabel.
My own view remains that if we have a clean contest for SOLGthe exit price would be at least 125/200p so...
We all need to put our thinking caps on about the scenarios and what our collective position would be...