RE: Article6 Jan 2023 10:57
Oh dear Quady...
LSE now has a policy where you have to sign in on a regular basis...
Unfortunately that means I have seen your post in which you have gracelessly ****ged me off yet again.
Don't you realise how stupid you make yourself look...you are a figure of fun on here...
Let me take a couple of your 'infomed' observations:
"That is less than half of one percent.
Totally clueless.
We have to wait now for the strategic review and hope this shows us how we construct Alpala.
I don't think this forum has ever been this bad."
If you check, as I have just done, BHP's daily volume hjas only once been above 0.1 percent in the last 12 months!
ANTO has only been above 0.5% once in 12 months and BP has never been above 0.3%...
And yet you are so incredibly well informed and experienced in the markets...
As to your observations on the strategic review, where in the terms of reference does it mention showing "how to construct Alpala..."
- evaluating financing alternatives for the Combined Group;
- a spin-out of assets, other than the Cascabel Project, to all shareholders of the Combined Group;
- the direct or indirect acquisition of an interest in ENSA and/or the Cascabel Project howsoever effected; or
·- any other transaction or series of related transactions as may be agreed to between the Parties.
And finally...one of the main reasons "the forum has been this bad" is the vast number of posts that you stir up with your uninformed nonsense...
Happy New Year