Member Info for Martc

Page 8 Para 3, Com(m)unication, says it all really, lets hope the clinical trials and results are more effectively checked than the spelling on the pdf. Nit picking you might say, but it sticks out like a sore thumb and shows an unprofessional attitude. Still holding but getting more disillusioned by the day.

Very interesting, I looked at the News tab and it opened with a subject entitled, 'Poor communications can cost you, REALLY cost you.' Hopefully GM took a minute to read this article!

Very gentlemanly Bulldog, a rarity on this board. Regards martc

Regarding your comment British Bulldog I think Gilders is referring to the fact that GM is presenting to his peers at Munich. It would be foolish for him to present if he had nothing worthwhile to say. I don't believe it was an attempt by Gilders to deramp merely an observation on his part.

Hi tkr234 I fully appreciate that point, but the original message stated 'seen 80+' I would dearly love that they had been seen, but as it is that figure is conjecture. That was my point, if the word estimated had been used then fine. Due to the fact the eyes on the ground cannot (and nor would I expect them to) be there 24/7, then all tanker figures are only estimates. This may be considered a pedantic post but it is the sort of thing that is picked up on by detractors. As a small holder of some 300k of these I am hoping that my patience is rewarded in due course all the best to you.

Where did you get that figure of 80+ tankers from? Certainly not that number confirmed by sightings. This is not intended as a deramp but a genuine query as the numbers bandied around are getting more extravagant by every utterance.

Good afternoon all, I see a few references to this subject but looking back can see no information as to what this is actually referring to. Information would be appreciated. Thank you.

Stop being so touchy will and look back at the posts, I believe he is referring to the post by wassells himself.

You have lost me there MrT, why are you reposting old news from 2014?

Hi Tozerk in answer to the questions I have no ideawhy they need another vehicle to take it forward, as I originally said maybe I am talking Boll---s but things never seem straight forward here in Val land. Just musing I suppose. Oh well time will tell.

I have had a quick read of all available postings tonight, and am a little alarmed at the formation of another company with just 4 shareholders. Could this be a vehicle for GM and Satuu to grab the products and work independently? Just musing and I know I could be talking ****** but who knows. Another thought is that with the proliferation of Middle East names, could it involve Dinoy who used to post until abused off the boards. Still holding but losing hope daily.

thanks uncanny that bit was ok, it was a pdf attachment that was an issue.

Ok that's fine for you but I wont be opening it.

Be careful, I tried opening the Pdf and my computer security advised of a malware on it.

If your post was at 08.33 its still on my board mate.

Didn't DL have a pop at the Telegraph and its reporting not long ago? I would imagine he wont be shy of commenting on this effort.

Going by 401 data its probably 8 but that's just me being a bit cynical. Cue there for a Freddyboy tirade lol.

Seriously Will1734 get a sense of humour. That was obviously a tongue in cheek post.

Been and gone, next one next year.

This has probably been answered previously but, why does the time of the video clip not tally with the apparent time of videoing, date stamp is correct, why not that as well. Just curious.