Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Why on earth do you people respond to this sort of communication? All of you positive thinkers go on about,' read the RNS', and yet respond to this man as though he is the messiah, why not follow your own advice and wait for RNS for company information. Enough said.
Mojobojo, From the last interview by Stephen Sanderson it would seem that finances are in a good place and that he doesn't anticipate a placing. You should look at the interview and make your own assessment. There are obviously different opinions and interpretations of said interview but this is what my understanding of the situation is. I offer no advice and am merely giving an answer to your question.
Regarding your fracking comment concerning UKOG Noise. The Oil in place is within naturally fractured rock formations and does not require fracking in order to be extracted. I mention this purely to prevent misinformation leaking out via this board. Apologies to Gilders for going slightly off piste for this post.
Certainly wont if people sell 756000 for 5.9p, like someone did today!!
Thank you Badger, that's what it looked like to me just needed a second opinion.
Same not sae, m key is playing up.
Can anybody explain the 130000 trades at 08.57 this morning, showing a price of 3.29 its not a LSE glitch as the sae price being shown on ADVFN.
Just an observation 14 but please rectify your spelling mistake, every time you repeat your statement it contains the same error, unless I am very much mistaken it should read 'bears' not 'bares'. Don't know why but it irks me every time I see it.
Page 8 Para 3, Com(m)unication, says it all really, lets hope the clinical trials and results are more effectively checked than the spelling on the pdf. Nit picking you might say, but it sticks out like a sore thumb and shows an unprofessional attitude. Still holding but getting more disillusioned by the day.
Regarding your comment British Bulldog I think Gilders is referring to the fact that GM is presenting to his peers at Munich. It would be foolish for him to present if he had nothing worthwhile to say. I don't believe it was an attempt by Gilders to deramp merely an observation on his part.
Hi tkr234 I fully appreciate that point, but the original message stated 'seen 80+' I would dearly love that they had been seen, but as it is that figure is conjecture. That was my point, if the word estimated had been used then fine. Due to the fact the eyes on the ground cannot (and nor would I expect them to) be there 24/7, then all tanker figures are only estimates. This may be considered a pedantic post but it is the sort of thing that is picked up on by detractors. As a small holder of some 300k of these I am hoping that my patience is rewarded in due course all the best to you.
Where did you get that figure of 80+ tankers from? Certainly not that number confirmed by sightings. This is not intended as a deramp but a genuine query as the numbers bandied around are getting more extravagant by every utterance.