Member Info for Markshares

Interesting that you have poo-pooed the idea since it was first mentioned, blahblahdoh, then as it looks like becoming a reality, you turn your negativity towards Open Orphan not being involved. It stinks of an agenda.

The fact is this article proves that the wearables idea does have some traction, gives a lot more credence to the idea we are speaking with competitors of fitbit, and that a deal for our data is a lot less unlikely than you like to suggest.

Always glass half empty for you minimal, one could equally say of you that every single positive rns that comes out is met with a negative post from you.

You could also look at the huge selling that has happened for a ridiculously sustained period of time and say the sp has held up incredibly in that time. Most people know the selling is where the rns' affects have been hiding but for some reason you choose not to. I wonder why(?)

ok123, what were you referring to when you were talking about a short term blip in demand?

Sadly there is no worst industry than hospitality to be in right now. Could probably buy back twice as many in a short time

??

Ask yourself, do you trust this company? Do you trust Sanderson?

Mention of a dividend is a big deal too. He should have been pressed for more detail on that, for example when he envisages that becoming a reality. Bit crazy to go from a placing to talking about dividends in a matter of months, just shows what a s**tshow the whole placing idea was

Someone get a tissue, moanymans crying again

His comment about 'read the news today' is saying the government are having to use them as they lack the capacity otherwise.

Was worried with his maths, 50% SP rise every 6 months is 125% year on year, not 100%

No real mention of selling ORPH anymore, he talked a lot more in terms of "years". You presume he has seen too much long term potential here and is happy with the idea of significant dividends along the way

I believe it means when a market maker buys more than one stock in a single transaction, normally as part of the deal they do so at a discount to the current SP(s). if you can be bothered to search the rest of aim, may find matching trades for the same time stamp

Why the big drop today (in particular)? Feel like this is priced to fail now, but how likely to people believe that to be?

Yet another "if"...

We accept it by proxy. It doesn't matter if you believe it or not. What matters is there are 1 or 2 wearable manufacturers in discussion with ORPH and if they make an offer, it doesn't even matter if it doesn't work.

Any news here

I think if anyone is capable of moving forward in the AI field with that, it would be apple/google. I think anyone can see the value and relevance of a device that suggests you may be unwell before you even feel it yourself. I guess the wearable would compare data it already knows about the user with predictive data from the ORPH databases to make informed predicitions

Wasn't great to hear about II selling from the 11p raise BUT what I really took from it, is that CF answered that question, and others, honestly where I think 90% of CEOs would have dodged it entirely. To me that showed a level of honesty and transparency and i he is honest and transparent about any negatives, one can extrapolate that he is honest about everything else; potential deals, spin offs, size of contracts, the works.

It's a rare and incredibly important trait in an AIM company and I think he is the reason that people are so comfortable to hold long term.

Serious question for you moanyman, given your longevity here is not matched by enthusiasm for ORPH, can you not find another company(s) of the 100s on aim or 1000s publicy traded in the UK that you feel have more reliable prospects? Just never understand why people hold shares in a company (if indeed you still d) then whinge constantly about them. Is FOMO the only thing that you feel keeps you here?

The late reported trades are starting to look like buys, confirmed by the simple fact we were blue yesterday. 1m trade plus others went through last night. If we get similar today we should expect an rns from a new buyer over the next few days

Anyone would look clever to you, moanyman. You not buying a story doesn't make the story a galaxy, it just means you can't see what's in front of your nose

The blarney had not 'failed to convince the market', it's been nothing short of exceptional the volume of selling that has been soaked up by PIs as a result of it. Don't understand you your motive moanyman, but you must have an agenda when every post you make ignores the selling or belittles the effect of acacia