Member Info for MarkP1989

Bumping this thread due to the utter, utter rubbish now being posted

I'm pretty sure that's standard lingo when suspension is announced by AIM, as it was.

The share was suspended by AIM and not at the request of NOMAD or EUA.

The reason(s) behind the suspension have clearly now been resolved between the company/NOMAD and the regulator, thus trading may resume.

As for an explanation as to what the hell went on, well, I don't think we will get one. This is NOT because the company are trying to 'keep us in the dark' or 'mislead investors' but simply because they are not legally allowed to comment on any matters associated with market regulators.

I'd love to know the reason(s) behind the events of the past 36 hours but hey ho.

The RNS this evening also told us that absolutely nothing has changed. Asset/Company sale still on. The waiting resumes.

GLA

Current RNS from the Company only states 'expects'.

Formal restoration I think will come tomorrow from AIM and say something along the lines of:

"EURASIA MINING PLC

Trading on AIM for the under-mentioned securities was temporarily suspended. The suspension is lifted from 18/05/2022 7:30am, an announcement having been made."

LOL @ the announcement having been made part

Bouncy bouncy.

GLA

BBG on vox

https://audioboom.com/posts/8072769-bill-brodie-good-of-alien-metals-discusses-further-high-grade-mineralisation-at-elizabeth-hill

16% spread ain't encouraging any buying.

Or perhaps that's what they want...

Anybody taking any sort of investment advice from somebody who thinks "worser" is a word needs to give their head a wobble.

I trust your grasp of company financials is as good as your understanding of the English language.

More like a stump wobble; there's **** all of the tree left.

Second bump

Bump

Guess you know best, Calamari.

You do have over 7000 posts on here after all.

Well said.

Too much mis-information on these boards, especially at the moment.

Explains the rise today. Maybe they'll RNS it Monday.

And Sharebel. And Chrispthomas.

Funny old game this

Please take note of your own advice:

"Gem - you do realise he’s looking for a cheap entry points then he’ll go very quiet. No-one spends this much time trying to trash a stock he apparently doesn’t want to invest in and endless posts on why"

You're purely agenda driven.

The damage has been done. War or no war sanctions will be imposed on Russia from all over the world and these will remain for some time.

This has taken Russia back years.

But the bigger picture here has to be the lifes that have/will be affected.

If the biggest concern you have at the moment is whether to log on to your investment account from the comfort of your living room, consider yourself lucky.

"Tier 1 Scale" means deposits that are "company making".

A very prudent addition to the RNS. Not only is it explaining the significance of a Tier 1 asset, but also hints at the fact that this deposit will, quite literally, make another company - EUA v 2.0

GLA

Porky, thanks for taking the time to write a structured and comprehensive response.

Absolutely no issues with new CFO being awarded Options, I get that. Just somewhat annoyed that Duncan et al have also gifted themselves these.

Yeah, they threw a load of skin in the game last year - showed a lot of confidence in the share - but I guess they sure as hell weren't expecting to see the SP drift back towards these levels. The cheap Options feel like a sly tactic to average down on their investment.

Let's see what Q1 brings.

Good luck all

For what it's worth: I'm in exactly the same boat here, crl.

Still believe massively in the Company but unfortunately lost a little fait in the BoD recently. I will see if they redeem themselves by end of Q1.

Good luck mate.

Porky - I'd be interested to hear your view on the recent Options awarded by Directors, to Directors (apologies if you've already discussed it numerous times).

For me, I've been fairly comfortable with my investment here, despite the slipping share price over the past year. Fundamentals of the company have only improved.

However, this grant of options or 'pat on the back' seems hugely unjust, especially at the price they were issued. It's a massive two fingers to loyal investors and quite literally it is stealing money out of our pockets.

I remain invested.

GLA