RE: New Investors Query24 Jun 2025 07:33
Currently we have about 690m shares in issue, and the share price is roughly 27p giving the company a market cap around £186m.
If we apply the valuation percentages I just mentioned to the estimated £13b to £24b in situ profit value, here’s what I got (please feel free to challenge these figures as I don’t want to miss anything).
At 1% of in situ value, the market cap would be £240m which translates to a share price of about 34.8p which were already targeting via the charts.
At 3%, the market cap jumps to £390m to £720m, or 56.5p to 104.4p per share.
At 5% to 10%, the market cap ranges from £650 million to £2.4 billion, with a share price between 94.2p and 347.8p
Right now, the market cap is roughly 0.63% of the estimated in situ value, which is very low, even by early stage exploration standards and especially low given the scale and location (which has a far lower risk premium that often suppresses valuations in parts of Africa, Southeast Asia, or Latin America). It also makes the project vastly more appealing for future joint ventures, project finance, or offtake negotiations with end-users or majors.
In terms of peer comparisons, my workings follow an industry trend so again I keep getting these confirmations? Again feel free to challenge as I don’t want this to be a one-sided vacuum.
Sovereign SVML (ASX/AIM) was trading at 3% to 5% of in situ TiO2 value once its resource was defined, even though it’s in Malawi, a much riskier jurisdiction.
Andrada Mining (AIM), despite being in Namibia and focused on lithium and tin, trades around 2% to 3% of in situ once metallurgy and expansion plans were outlined.
Iluka Resources, the largest pure-play titanium company in Australia, of course trades at much higher valuations but shows how the market supports these types of deposits once de-risked.
These aren’t perfect comparisons but they give us a rough guide. Once we have the MRE out and metallurgy confirmed, there’s every reason to think we could move into that 3% - 5% bracket initially, even conservatively. That alone would be a significant re-rate.
I don’t want this to be misleading in any way so happy to discuss this in detail. There are obviously still many steps to go before this value gets recognised fully in the share price. The MRE needs to confirm the size, the metallurgy must show recoveries (78% already secured) that support the margin assumptions, and we will need to communicate a clear path to development and production which SB says he is confident of achieving.
That said, if the MRE comes in strong and the project is de-risked further, I think there’s every reason to believe the market will rerate us substantially higher, potentially multiple times the current price.
The upside potential here is real, and as shareholders, we’re in a good spot if the story continues to unfold positively. Roll on August.
ML