Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Lets be honest we have been lied to for years now, by the looks of things a working system hasn't left the drawing boards, they could have played a blinder at 9p with a massive rights issue and got the bit between the teeth and made the dam dmg, but a rudderless ship comes to mind. Now a rudderless ship without a captain, crew or sail.
Not wanting to sound like I am trolling but, does anyone have the financial information for how long phe can survive treading water like this? if they are down to the last year of pocket money and we have no news soon, then I would worry if the company would simply merge with HUI, who are also doing about as much treading of said water, although admittedly the floatation will have given them some wiggle room.
Does anyone have a realistic timeline for the technology development and site development for the next 2 years? For example I know there is a financial closure at the end of March, what is the likely outcome of that. Will Mitchell Dryers have developed the TCC by EOY.
It seems the promise of regular comms has fallen to the wayside again
pubs and restaurants are packed to The rafters?
Absolute horse ****e, of the pubs near me 3 of the 7 have recently closed, all due to the rising energy costs. I imagine you live in a city if you believe that, here in the countryside things arent all rosey.
mjallen, sorry should have phrased that better, my query was more directed to peel site as a whole. I realised phe is just one small cog in the Cheshire site, it seems though that the protos site as a whole apart from plot 3 and 9a hasnt gone anywhere.
Is this due to the individual funding model for eachc plot?
Can anyone hazard a guess at the hold up for the peel site, is it just simple lack of funding? I understand phes hold up to a degree, but 3 years after prepping the site peel seem to have done sweet f all.
I know its not a legal requirement but is it normal for AFC not to release one? Not trying to stir the pot but just a genuine question as to the potential reasons. Apologies if this has been asked I dont frequent this forum that much
Cant help but feel the BOD in 2020/2021 basicly lied to share holders about the readiness of the dmg, as it is now clear they are only just finalising the Thermal combustion chamber in partnership with Manchester Uni. This surely should be have been finalised along time ago
Loads,
you dont have to start a new topic to reply, you can simply use the rely button at the bottom right of the last comment.
I have followed stans book with interest but the problem with penny growth stock is that they dont slowly move up. But when they do go up they normally rocket leaving the 200ma well behind. If you look the last time phe went above and stayed above the 200ma for any length of time was december 2019.
Stan recommends not buying until the company is above the 200ma, I feel this might mean investors would miss any ind of sustained rise in the phe sp until its too late. It really is a hit or miss situation for profit making here, it all rests on the dmgs getting actually built. I hope hui and phe merge as it seems like hui can take on most of europe whilst phe is restricted to the british isles and the whim of peel group.