Member Info for madsktpan

The only reason the sp will plummet in the coming days is IF there is loads of sellers!! Nothing else. Simple as. If the MMs had a problem with this announcement then it would have marked it down almost immediately the RNS was released. They didn't. In fact they raised the offer. Must say I was surprised as usually they don't like something 'sudden' like this with no apparent replacement CEO lined-up. Albeit there are temporary stand-ins. Hopefully they have a new CEO in mind and are just going through the formalities.

Thought the Market might have reacted a tad negatively to this......... but it appears not.

Don't take any notice or financial advice from (or be misled by) a tallestknobber of a bitter & twisted hypocrite who clearly is someone who speaks with forked tongue whilst losing his shirt with his investment with CPP:- "load up folks this rock bottom share price will average down the price you have paid. for example; if your holding was bought at 14p and if you top up at 7p now that will become 14p+7p=21p, 21 divide by 2=10.5p (14p share is now 10.5p and be happy with that) in my case: my holding was bought at 34p and i topped up at 7p now that have become 34p+7p=41p, 41 divide by 2=20.5p (34p share is now 20.5p and i am also happy with this now)" LMAO

Clearly one of those who feels he has to be seen as being always right. Always having the last word. Sad beyond words. Have a nice weekend everyone.

wasn't a dumb question at all. My broker told me new 1p shares should be issued with a confirmation regarding the deferred 9p shares. I still only have my 10p nominal value share certificate. There are absolutely no 0.00001p shares trading on AIM. A fact. Another lie and/or deliberate misrepresentation of yours. You keep on stating a billion share capital. D'oh, If only!! And how can anything stagnate for several years and keep vanishing for ever????? That's the talk of a mental retard.

Anyone who asks such a dumb question......... is clearly dumb. The deferred 9p share is an irrelevance today as to the current trading value of CPP shares. It may become more relevant at a later point in time though. Hence why it is 'deferred'. D'Oh!! Hence why it's been trading over the past couple of months at anything between 4-5p regardless if the nominal amount on the certs was 10p or 1p. And regardless of being on the main market or on AIM. I have AIM listed shares that have more than a billion in circulation (is that what you mean by "1 billion share capital"?? LOL) don't produce the nett revenue that CPP are likely to yet share value is greater than CPP. The more you post the more ignorant you come across imho.

More boring unsubstantiated drivel. There's presumably no major buyers because there's no corporate news-flow as yet. All they have done is raise £20 million and move from one trading market to another. What this needs is the FSA situation to be done & dusted and for there to be corporate updates showing that the Company is generating income (and how much) and evidence that the new management team are moving the business forward. Until that happens there is unlikely to any significant movement to the sp. But there again such corporate news-flow could be at any time. How's knows? Not me. And definitely not you. And in any event it's been only a couple of days since when they have had the capital injection. They are not miracle workers.

You clearly don't know what the word 'deferred' means. Otherwise you wouldn't be asking your stupid questions. Deferred means = to delay or cause to be delayed until a future time. The 1p is for now. The 9p deferred share is for later. Simples!! You are asking the wrong question as usual. Ask the Company WHY they considered the need for the 10p nominal share value to be split into one 1p share with one 9p deferred share. Anyway I see you ignore the questions asked of you, as usual. What happened to all the naked short traders you predicted would appear when CPP traded on AIM? Why is it not sub 1p as you said it would? You were ramping the backside out of this only a few months ago. Now you boringly repeat it losing 80% of its value. Your credibility = zero.

As usual - you lie & conveniently mislead to make your stupid nonsensical point. What about the 9p deferred shares? Where are all the "naked traders" you predicted were going to short this stock once it traded on AIM? Why is the share price not sub 1p that you boringly banged & on & on about that would happen when stock traded on AIM?

Simples pee-brain......... haven't bought any CPP stock today as I am an investor, not a trader. I did my research & due diligence on CPP a couple of months back and decided to invest. I will hold until it shows a healthy profit and I am ever confident it will. Now, how about you answering some of the questions posed to you on here following on from all your drivel. You seem quick to post statements (most of which are illiterate and make no sense) or ask questions of others. Never answer any - even when you have been clearly made to to be a complete knobhead.

What you post is meaningless drivel. But I suspect you already know that. Just look at what the £20 million being actually invested by way of 3p shares is being used for. And it ain't "promished" (whatever that might mean).

Heard it all now. Why would any professional body (ie Pheonix) want to handover best part of £20million by paying 3p per share then want to short it?????????????? Tallest & Dumbest!! EVER.

Agreed. Stock will soon be hard to acquire in any quantity. Some positive commercial news flow should see this rebound once the dust settles after listing on AIM next Wednesday. Someone tell the tallest knobhead that virtually all stock that trade on AIM have a nominal value of 1p. And that nominal value on the share certificate has nothing whatsoever to do with the share trading value.

Just ignore him. Or better still filter him with the button at the top. He's clearly got the intelligence of a 10 year-old. He must be from another land given his **** poor command of the English language. Anyone who types the word 'non' on numerous occasions instead of 'none' - is either a frog, or needs some clinical help. Most of his posts are deranged and make so sense whatsoever. Ignore him PLEASE. On a more relevant note - has anyone received their new shares? The 1p one and the 9p deferred one? Thanks.

That is a lie and complete nonsense. They don't have their Placement shares yet. They won't have them until 10/2/15. They will have paid 3p each for them. So, why would they want them to be trading at 1p?? Talk sense man. Plus, even if they wanted to sell them they would (as major shareholders in the Company) have to make a public declaration when they trade them. It is a legal obligation under AIM rules & regs. I can understand long-term holders being bitter & twisted. But there is no need to lie and make stupid fantasy scenarios up. I'm out of here. Won't post again. Complete waste of time to do so.

Frankly, it doesn't matter a toss if the nominal value on the share certificate shows 1p or 10p or 25p. What is important & relevant is what your shares are worth and can be traded at. The shares that Phoenix & Co are buying over the next 3-4 weeks to then trade on AIM wef 11/2/15 are currently worth circa 4.25p and they are purchasing them for 3p. But as they will then become major shareholders of CPP they shouldn't be able to trade them without making a public declaration of any further transactions (be it additional purchases and/or any selling of CPP stock).

All voted through overwhelmingly. Might see a bit of volatility with the sp over next 3-4 weels but hopefully it'll find its level once trading on AIM. Remember when the new shares trade on AIM then 93% will be held that effectively won't be able to be traded (unless with a RNS). So, that leaves only an absolute maximum of 7% of shares in circulation could be made available to the MMs to be traded. It seems logical that IF there's any positive corporate news and ANY buying pressure will see the shares trade substantially higher than today's price.

It depends what your 'new' 1 ord share of 1p is worth in the marketplace when they trade on AIM (the exact same shares that the 3 participants are purchasing in respect of the £20 million placement for which they are paying 3p for those 1p ord shares). If you look at it another way - if there is a share consolidation then the 3 investors are about to have 90% of the value of the shares they have just bought 'lost'. I don't think so, somehow. Not to overlook that 2 of the investors already own a considerable quantity of stock. Would they be mad enough to agree to that value being reduced by 90%? I don't think so, somehow. I would be gobsmacked if the MMs haven't already factored any dilution into today's price. But we'll soon know as I would expect an RNS later today or tomorrow.

and in any event the 3 parties investing in the £20 million Placement will own 93% of the shares in circulation after the vote tomorrow. I cannot see how it would be in their strategic interests to sell ANY of their holding for at least a year. Plus of course they would have to declare in public any and all transactions made, for all to see. You get a lot of de-ramping nonsense on these BBs but today on here is just about the biggest drivel I've heard in quite a while. I think in a short period of time these shares will be impossible to acquire in any sizeable quantity.

You sound real bitter & twisted. A company like Phoenix don't take a 40% stake unless they see a multiple return. They don't invest £14 million to sell a poxy few shares at a profit over 3p.