RE: Hum12 Aug 2020 00:48
It’s late and I’ve had a few beers & a couple of glasses of wine ( nothing new there), it’s been a loss day as well so not all is rosy, but blaming it all on the board is not the right approach in my opinion.
I’m not sure how many investors here have run a public company or even a private limited company with all the day to day pressures?
I’ve only been invested in HUM since last December. Before that I was invested in AAU 100% and all I can say is that that the engagement with shareholders is completely different, but for me the difference with AAU is the willingness to engage in discussion with the Board.
The impression I have here is that there are too many dissatisfied shareholders, who invested at a higher price when so much was promised and not achieved in terms of the share price. As a result, so many decisions have been criticised. I suppose that’s inevitable, but put yourselves in the shoes of the Directors trying to steer this in the right direction. Ok, I understand that they are well paid, have cheap share options, but surely they are geared up to criteria that we want from company?
However, as shareholders, we now have a company that is heading in the right direction, which is what the BoD set out to achieve, but that engagement still doesn’t really exist.
Maybe some old wounds need to be healed and better engagement is required going forwards. It works both ways and what’s to lose?
Cheers, Ash