Member Info for LWHL

Could be a trap, to sucker in some buyers.

Given the lack of an update since the last RNS, this one firmly remains, IMO, a barge-pole stock and one that should be under investigation, as I have said before.

Well done again Mary. I did not add, but not trimmed further myself yet either.

I was quite happy with the current name (do not like the new one) and while not concerned with the update today, I did not anticipate more than a fairly flat day.

Demonstrating how totally out of touch I am right now with the 'feel' of SP movements, on a short term basis anyway.

It is less annoying when it is to the upside as an existing holder, as the silver lining to this particular cloud :) GLA.

Yes, hopefully you get a squeeze. It certainly looks possible on the live chart right now.

Fair point, sj. As long as the wider markets hold up, you might get a nice run up here in the lead up to that. And then hopefully the type of update that rewards you all and puts to bed any lingering market concerns.

Still very much on my radar in the meantime. GLA.

I thought the update was OK. Not strong enough to set a buy order, or chase the price at the open, but not one where I breathed a sigh of relief at being on the sidelines, either.

I can see the validity of some of the points that the bearish poster makes about a little lack of meat on the bone, but assuming there is an investor call later, no doubt that can be addressed then.

As always, inside buying, especially from the CEO now he can, would IMO be as good an indicator as any, of the belief in the narrative here. After those juicy Barker purchases, anything less from Jose will be unimpressive.

I think the shorts are going to unwind here now, but sadly, no short squeeze. GLA.

Must say I would only be tempted back in myself at the low 130's level, although might not get there, of course.

Also watching to see if we get any inside buying. Nothing like some meaty purchases to demonstrate the old maxim of actions speaking louder than words... GLA.

Good luck for tomorrow holders. This is one of several that I will be watching closely in the morning, when the RNS prints.

IMO, barring a really bad update, the SP is well-positioned at this level to move up.

Today was the first time my buy order would have hit...naturally on the day that I forgot to set it.

However, depending on how I take the update, I may look to rejoin you again, although I might not get the chance, of course. Unless the update is terrible, the shorts are at risk here, IMO. GLA.

Absolutely. I thought high 50's was nailed on. Not unhappy to see a strong reversal however. Maybe a blue finish, against all odds?

Perhaps Cos' are buying more? GLA.

I would like to hear such assurances too, Pokerchips.

The trouble is, faith in the BOD is understandably low, so it is likely going to need a lot of time to repair that faith - assuming no further mistakes.

Agree with those posters who said great business, poor management. Hey ho.

Did not sell my small core holding, but not a buyer at these prices either.

Will take a view if we see high 50's.

Would take a buy out at one quid right now, lol. GLA.

Not for the first time, I find myself pondering whether this POS will ever actually start to wash its own face. Even turn a profit. Not for the first time, I reflect on how generously SOH rewards himself, year after year. Going to need to make a decision on this one soon, I think. GLA.

As predictable as the British weather.

The only positive is the decent sized inside contribution.

Might buy a few more sub 5p and look to trade my way out of my tiny position here, rather than simply take the loss, but undecided as yet.

Hopefully some of the hostile posters who were shouting de-rampers etc in the past few weeks or so, will pipe down now. Not that I think many of that ilk even hold shares here anyway.

I am not sure if that MSN site is entirely reliable either, but regardless, I stand by my previous comment.

Presumably we will see some updates once the funding/dilution deal kicks in anyway. With, I expect, all of those ii's showing a reduction (diluted) in their holding here, if not some who have finally decided to update the market with their total exit, perhaps.

The 8p funding arrangement roster of new and existing participants kept me in this one, at a point when I was starting to reconsider. Having been a holder, most unfortunately, since the 18p days I think, with genuine LTH patience and investor mentality.

Not a mistake I will ever make with such outfits in future. Quick trades now and again on certain euphoric moments, sure. Investing? Nope.

You see plenty of posters lamenting and castigating the short term mentality of 'rainbow chasers', incapable of holding for more than short periods.

When it comes to AIM stocks, it is almost always the investor, not the trader, who turns out to be the fool.

The only longer term winners are the lifestyle directors in these types of outfits.

This one would not pass my sniff test now. Even before the latest RNS.

Shame I applied different (less stringent) criteria to my stock market investments a few years ago.

I would have saved quite a lot of money by avoiding this one altogether. Barge-pole territory, through and through.

Finally some inside buying, although not nearly enough, and accompanied by the typical AIM dilution/soaking.

IMO, this is clearly an act of desperation to keep the salaries coming in for a bit longer. I think you cover the key realities in your post, CJ39.

The odd small spike here and there could still happen - this is AIM after all - but I think this is highly, highly, likely to go bust at some point. If their pipeline was any value whatsoever, it would have made better progress by now, as far as I am concerned. The BOD would have also bought in big and long before now, which is perhaps the biggest clue of them all.

And even if by some miracle they ever do get to a point where one of the products reaches commercialisation-ready stage, they will have made it virtually impossible for ordinary shareholders to benefit much, if at all, anyway.

STX comes to mind on that front.

I wonder if the major shareholder register will ever be updated again? I find it inconceivable that it remains the same as before, going back to the 8p days. Hey ho.

Ah well, GLA and good weekend all too.

Presumably Nike will put the squeeze (even more than they usually would) on their suppliers, in the weeks ahead.

A combination of that, plus some headcount cuts, will see them hit that 2 billion target IMO.

That does raise some uncertainties here IMO, until we get some idea of how it might play out.

Hopefully the question will be addressed by our BOD in the next update.

Better they do so head on, rather than leave residual fear which the shorts will ruthlessly exploit.

Still not adding myself at this point, but not selling either. GLA.

Yes, but also the fault of the regulatory authorities for so rarely doing their job, when it comes to investigating so many AIM operations. Clear patterns of insider trading, front running raises, outright lies in RNS's etc.

Better off saving that tax payer money by getting rid. At the same time, removing the veneer of protection that does not seem to exist anyway. Even when a dodgy company does get caught, the consequences for the directors are never severe enough IMO. Such is life. GLA.

They will let it go once 'they' have finished loading up, IMO.

Hopefully soon, but I have said that before! :) GLA.

While it is never ideal to see a project fail and money wasted, it was not sufficient for me to exit my position here either, although I did not add (spread once again undesirable).

What are the thoughts of others here?

As an aside, I assume the low today will have taken out naked trader's long position, if he had not already closed it before today.

He is not humble, I think it is fair to say, and also does not take criticism well either, but that does not concern me.

He has got a lot of calls right. He is very intelligent (if clearly stubborn, eg crypto) and IMO brings a lot of education and ideas to the table. And does not lack the courage of his convictions, which is a breath of fresh air, generally.

I happen to agree with him on crypto. But fundamentally because I do not think the global establishment are going to tolerate a parallel medium of exchange, if one ever gets too powerful.

Not least with their CBDC plans. Now that is something that should worry all critical thinkers. Hey ho. GLA.

I enjoy his podcasts, but he has been saying the same thing for years.

I have a heavy weighting in my p/f of PM stocks. Have done for several years. Side pot trading a few of the names has helped me to keep a degree of sanity to date!

Had I just bought and held pretty much all of them, I would be underwater in every single one I think.

At the time of print, this only applies to FRES now, but I am continuing to work on lowering my average here, while trying to de-risk with slices etc, when I can.

Naturally I would love to see silver have a good run, to at least test the ATH, as every other commodity has in the past 40 years except silver, but if it happens, it happens. Not putting the house on it.

On the subject of PF: if you have not already seen his speech to the mortgage bankers in 2006 I think it was, well worth checking it out on youtube. GLA.