Member Info for Luckybob23

October 2020

As announced on 28 September, this first portfolio Inventory Monetisation is expected to have a value of approximately €300m and deliver approximately £20.5m of annual revenue into its securitisation vehicles. This is expected to generate average annual net servicing fees of £6.5m for Supply@ME.

Final negotiations, operating and regulatory tasks are proceeding well. The objective is to complete the first transaction in the coming weeks together with a scalable funding agreement that enables the Investor to increase its investment and monetise additional Client Companies that are in the pipeline.

" Even allowing for the increased share float the current sp is well below the level syme held when there were no IM`s ....No Italian law change, No TF settlement, First UK IM and a very positive AGM."

1 . Back then we were expecting an IM of 300m being imminent.

2. We were told true sale was bullet proof, didn't need a law change until that suddenly became an excuse.

3. We were told we would have a captive bank with 2-8 billion in funding.

4. We hadn't bought a company we didn't need and couldnt afford which resulted in several CLNs

So to say we are in a better place now after completing a couple of small IMs compared to what was expected to happen back then is ludicrous and stinks of shill BS.

Things have changed, we've had to adapt to bring the funders appetite back.. we are working toward that and hopefully those big ticket IMs happen soon.

But if your going to talk.. use your mouth not your rectum

Are you a Bot?

Every post starts the same.. then goes on to accuse everybody of been Sage.. like you've got access to all the IP addresses ey?

Thanks GH..

Was going to say the same but couldn't remember the details

Ah , well we definitely haven't monetised $460m of inventory.. at the time if writing I'm not even sure we'd monetised any inventory..

Only thing I can think is it relates to tradeflow

"Volume of contracts completed last 12 months 460 million!"

Not following you?

Nobody has any idea how quickly or slowly it will be.

Because we've no idea how many funders are interested in clearing the huge pipeline.

So anyone claiming it will be next year, or next week is just speculating .

Which is pointless and reeks of an agenda.

We have a large client list.. just no evidence of the funds to support it.

Nor any info on who's funded so far, which would be nice to know.

The only thing keeping the SP down is the large sells from whomever is trading this, plus the lack of meaningful revenue.

Hopefully we see a big ticket IM or two soon, that should increase confidence of both investors and other funders.

Guess it's nothing new..

Just stands out more when there's only 15 messages and only one still left

No idea who's posting but all I can see is many messages posted and almost none remain.

Why on earth would we want a takeover??

You think someone's going to come along and just pay way over the odds... it would be a terrible deal for shareholders, just like everything else that AZ has done so far.

Nobody cares

I take two days off looking in here and suddenly there's a bunch of twàts on both sides of the fence waffling shìt all day 😂😂😂

Don't know who any of you are but you're certainly not long term holders ...

Obviously if you are going to raise funds, doing it off the back of a rise is better than not.

Anyone complaining about it bought on the rise and is just bitter.

The rest of us I'm sure are happy to get the ball rolling again after such a long delay.

If you don't like it stop investing in aim companies

Says the guy with a brand new profile who's nobody's ever heard of..

Serious question.. would you not raise cash after a rise? Knowing you've got to raise at somepoint!

Must be nice to be in your 60s and still have the mind of a child.

TAG is trading this! Everything else is a distraction to hide the fact.

The loan shares are smoke and mirrors.

The CLN another way to hide the truth..

Always someone to blame and always someone to push that narrative..

What we need is to demonstrate how quickly these "interested funders" can be converted into executed IMs.

Shouldn't take that long you'd think once we get past the proving up stage

The thing Is MRRR, the rns does not state the uk IM will be completed by 30th June.

"to finalise the necessary definitive commercial agreements in relation to the Transaction by 30 June 2023."

Read that carefully

That's a fair comment Mistergreen, I'm not too bothered if it is either, however, there's folk yet again trying to build up expectations and if it doesn't happen on that date the usual thing is a drop.

So I'd rather question the choice of wording and have an open mind than join in on building expectations and see them dashed.

There wouldn't of been half the hard hitting drops over the last few years if it weren't for the same few people trying to hype expectations.

Personally I'd rather not have to listen to a bunch of muppets popping up moaning just because for some few pisters everyday is a salespitch