Member Info for Luckybob23

It might , if there wasn't there wasn't a 33% spread.

Then again, I doubt anyone would be upset about a real rise

Or just tell us .. that would be the better option

Which ones knobby?

What a strange thing to say.

It's the equivalent of been at school and saying "I know something you don't know"

It's been dragged up by tiny buys over the ask so they can keep the sell price up

They could try, but there wouldn't be a grain of truth in it.

Since I've never had another profile, nor have I tried to hype a single share ive invested in.

I was talking about hench anyway.

You've been spouting the same dribble for years under one name or another.

You're nawt but a weasel con man.

If I'd been wrong as many times as you I'd of quot posting but you are shameless

Dracula, if you reply was to me..

Then, no I'm not invested anymore, I was a few years back when I bought in after it rose from 1.5p to 3p and caught my attention, I bought up to 7p and missed the 66p high, convinced it was a tree shake, started selling around 56p all the way down .

Did very well out of it. Kept some for another year and sold the majority of my portfolio to fund buying a house.

I'm not going to argue with you.

I'm simply saying the FCA have no power here and most shares.

You can go on their website if you like , it's very easy to contact them, as I've done it. That's how I know the FCA have no power .

It's AIM though, the purpose is to fund companies by listing and dilution is inevitable.

Not justifying it, but anyone can pick 50 aim shares and find none in overall profit 5 years later.

I've rooted for long term holder here ever since I sold.

Hope they do something to return some value, but after all this time I struggle to see how their ever going to do anything with 201

Are ValiRx authorised by the FCA?

Because if not there's not a thing they can do about it.

It may as well be wolf of Wall Street tbh.

If it was on AIm he wouldn't of gotten away with some of the things he has

No it doesn't..

Not following your logic with the spread?

There's nobody buying , that's why the spread is big.

Last few months there's been many tiny trades to create the illusion of liquidity so they can offload more bigger sells.

It's really not the circle of life on any share.

Only dodgy people's opinions change based on their position. We've seen many here.. hello shìtty, share beĺlend.. perfect examples.

Plenty of people have integrity and will tell it how they see it in or out.

Anyone putting strong buy in their posts at this point in time, given the history , is a self serving con man.

I've raised a complaint with the FCA because I didn't believe the response of others.

Unfortunately they were not lying when they said

" SYME is not registered with the FCA and therefore not their jurisdiction "

Or words to that effect.

I also reported it as market manipution, and told them spoof trading and other illegal share manipution techniques are been used and I believe syme are trading their own shares.

They pretty much don't care unless they are registered with the FCA.

They give you a link to action fraud .

Maybe I should of mentioned that omni who have a stake here , are actually an FCA registered company..

Anyway, don't take my word for it, it's easy to fill in the forms online on the FCA website.

As for an EGM, might be wrong, but doesn't that involve 7% of shareholders taking action.

The only big shareholders are AZs mates and PIs are scared of losing what they have left of their investment.

Plus there's a bit of Stockholm syndrome going on..

😂

The fact TAG have not announced it doesn't mean much.

AZ doesn't exactly abide by the rules and nobody can apparently do a thing about it.

But I suppose it could be any of the large investors , high net worth individuals.

They'll be buys, propping it up so they can sell bigger chunks

Can't remember when we last had an uncrossing Trade..

Which is odd.

Yep, and the posts today, where 2g2d stated he had inside information about the next IM