Member Info for Luckybob23

No, I've answered your question.

I have contacted various people over the years.

If this doesn't happen soon I'll then contact BPM.

But they aren't the ones who can answer anything related to symes operational tactics.

Like the rest of symes partners, I highly doubt they will acknowledge my questions.

You haven't answered anything

I've explained my concerns to AZ, to quadrivo (4 times), to storm harbour (before the went bust)

Again, You deflect because there are no plausible legitimate reasons for 90% of what AZ has done.

Why just deflect every criticism? Is it because you don't have answers for any of the wrong doings?

Because they can't be explained away can they..

You know the same thing was said about tradeflow when they were hailed the best thing since sliced bread . "Well they've looked under the hood and kike what they see" , no, they got made millionaires.

And quadrivo who were going to be £8b deep by now.

But hang on.. we never bought a bank, so they won't even fund 1m?? Weird isn't it.

Why was it we never bought a bank? Economic conditions! What economic conditions affect a captive bank who's sole purpose is to fund only syme?

It's a money making mechanism 2g2d

Why do you think TAG aren't publishing their accounts.

Explain the pledge to buy shares 2g2d.

Can you name any other company thats done that?

What passes me off more than losing money , is the amount of people on here refusing to acknowledge the huge red flags and just flat out denying how dodgy AZs moves have been.. like the pledge to huÿ shares..

Toodle pip

"Luckybob you coming agm?"

God no!

It's bad enough listening to the sly little weazle lying in all the interviews and rns..

He won't answer anything I have to ask him.

But if he looked me in the eyes and lied to my face, which he would, then I'd definitely lose my shìt.

It's a discussion board Jonah

Thats the point, to discuss.

Regardless of if people are positive or negative or impartial.

I dont hear you complaining about the likes of henchking or Hughes when they're spreading misinformation.

There was a business update 12 days ago

Jemini, Everybody is knobby or TW, but knobby is also TW soooo....

Alan, they're not buys.. look at the price

Same reason we never bought a bank..

Because he can't successfully trade it if its not spiking on news he can sell into to make the money to buy one

I can't understand why anyone is shocked.

Look at the trades.. it's been getting sold for the last 3 month solid.

AZ puts out news and nobody takes any notice because of his track record.. then the selling carries on.

Just observe the trades ..

Itl be TAG or AZ trying to scape the 1.5m to wash through ch trading hub to fund their end of the WL

Smith, are you suggesting Micky1 has no shares?

June I think

The Nasdaq listing rules allow companies to qualify under one of four sets of standards, based on the criteria listed above.

Standard 1: Earnings

A company’s earnings are a reflection of its profitability. To qualify for listing on the Nasdaq based on earnings alone, a company must be able to show:

•  Aggregate pre-tax earnings of $11 million or more for the three prior fiscal years

•  Earnings of $2.2 million or more for the two most recent fiscal years

•  Zero net losses for each of the three prior fiscal years

For a company to be included under this standard, they have to be able to check off all three of these boxes. If they can meet two criteria but not a third, they won’t be able to qualify for listing.

Standard 2: Capitalization with Cash Flow

Capitalization is a measure of a company’s size in relation to the rest of the market. Cash flow tracks the movement of cash in and out of a company. To qualify for Nasdaq listing under the capitalization with cash flow standard, the following rules apply:

•  Aggregate cash flow of $27.5 million or more in the prior three fiscal years

•  Zero negative cash flow for the prior three fiscal years

•  Average market capitalization of $550 million or more over the prior 12 months

•  Revenue of $110 million or more for the previous fiscal year

Again, all four of those conditions have to be met to qualify for Nasdaq listing using this standard.

Standard 3: Capitalization with Revenue

The third Nasdaq listing standard focuses on company size and revenue, which is a measure of income. The minimum requirements for both are as follows:

•  Average market capitalization of $850 million or more over the prior 12 months

•  Revenue of $90 million or more for the previous fiscal year

Larger companies may opt to take this route if they can’t meet the cash flow requirements under Standard 2.

Standard 4: Assets with Equity

In lieu of earnings or market capitalization, companies can use their assets and the value of shareholders’ equity to qualify for listing on the Nasdaq. There are three specific thresholds companies have to meet:

•  Market capitalization of $160 million

•  Total assets of $80 million

•  Stockholders’ equity of $55 million

Regardless of which standard a company uses to qualify for listing, they have to maintain them continually. Otherwise, the company could be delisted from the Nasdaq exchange

Bridge.

Can you explain then how you think syme will somehow overcome the requirements for listing on NASDAQ when they switch over?

Well I don't see how it would help us get listed on NASDAQ, since it's listed on NYSE American

Cheers peak.

Fingers crossed the man from delmonte says YES