I personally am only in for the profit I took in the few months i was invested in 2020, not too deep for my risk level, not that its any of your business. Everyone knows the risks of this stock, having lived through all the drops and shenanigans, along with having heard the same lines from you and your little gang of shorters who come here to spin webs of lies and mislead people for your own gain. What people do with their money is none of your business.
I'm not suggesting anyone should jump in, why bother playing dumb? You dont need an invite to post, but to come here and accuse people of something you are doing yourself, is dishonest and a pathetic failed attempt at gaslighting. We see through your crap GS.
GS i havnt tried to encourage anyone to buy, you are the only one who made a suggestion on what people should do with their money, or maybe you forgot what you wrote already?
"anyone invested here is basically walking blindly into the future with no real clue as to how it's going to affect their investment. Which, in my opinion, is reckless. Far better to stay out until the restructuring is finished and the threat of dilution has passed. Then and only then will this potentially be worth a punt."
Hate to break it to you but, Nobody asked for your advice!
HNS, I agree and it is mainly Disney letting the side down with their woke agenda bullshine. Every woke filled film seems to flop yet they persist in their ways to show it, however i don't think James Cameron will have allowed Disney to force him to shove a load of woke crap in his masterpieces (the next 3 Avatar films) that he has been working hard on for 13 years now. So we should be good, and Cineworlds 4DX will be a great way to enjoy the film. Fingers crossed.
oh yes, much better to stay out of a stock until no risk and probably no profit to be made. Another cracker from you, Giantsquit
this board gone right downhill, now just full of 'i'm more professional than you' 'no i am' posts..
ShearClass - Then again Boohoo just increased their stake in RevB to 26.47%.
surely with how well its been doing it makes sense to show it in more cinemas at this point? maybe they will be looking at it but just seems weird not to show it more places
"The Company's Results were on target to be published on 28 November 2022, as previously announced, having been audited by BDO LLP ("BDO"). It is standard practice that, should material allegations be made against a company undergoing an audit, then such company is subjected to an enhanced set of audit procedures."
If this were true wouldn't shorters just do this all the time as a way to decimate shareprice, it will work here because there is clearly something more to the story..
Look at the bigger picture though Imulhare, its very damaging for Cinemas for the studios to not be bound by exclusivity window. Might have felt like a mistake at the time to refuse to show the films, but ultimately studios have now had their chance to see for themselves that without that window they wont make as much money.. they return to Cinematic debut with a window and everyones happy again sooner or later as the money comes flowing in again like the good old times.
I really don't care about misplaced commas or whatever, its just fun to detract attention away from posters like Chai-wally when they come on starting thread after thread in quick succession.
A majority of the debt comes from acquiring Regal, and C$1bn debt from a dumb Canadian court ruling basing the award on 'lost synergies' that Cineplex would never have benefitted from in the first place. I know you are definitely a few months behind now because the debt is not $4.8bn.. when you catch up let me know.
Right.. thanks for that. Why the clickbait title?
good to see the yanks have joined us.
I meant there is no use for the 2nd comma in the sentence, which actually does add unnecessary pause. Personally don't think there is a need for one as a rule, as you suggest.
“Investors will be dreading finding out just how much, or indeed how little equity value will be left in Cineworld, even if it manages to get an inevitably deeply-discounted rescue cash call away”
could have even ended the sentence at Cineworld.
“Investors will be dreading finding out just how much, or indeed how little, equity value will be left in Cineworld. Even if it manages to get an inevitably deeply-discounted rescue cash call away, investors may be left with close to nothing.”
Hate to give them ideas of how to improve their tireless de-ramping articles, but so be it.
why would the 3rd comma be needed? Seems unnecessary to me as it doesn't add anything to the sentence, in fact it just adds more pause where there needn't be one.
you're*
if this was a real quote, there would be no comma between "how little, equity value" :) just saying
We already know all of this, you are about 3-4 months behind..
This article a while ago.. *provides no link*
Conclusion, article = In your own delusions