Dot the dot28 Jan 2020 17:55
I remember as a child the dot the dot books. Numbered points that when joined gave a picture that if you squinted you could probably work out anyway. So our 57 dots say, are not numbered and could be joined in any number of ways to make some interesting patterns. But by trial an error one can start to see a picture. But is it the picture we want to see rather than the true picture.?
I need an Infusion of clarity, or perhaps claret .2002, 2009 or 2012 vintage I do not know. I trawl through companies house now now only out of a morbid interest in the final picture revealed, and no longer with any intention to invest and definitely no intention in creating uncertainty for my own benefit. Believe it or not I never have done that
I don't know whether the bits and pieces I have noticed have any relevance whatsoever. Whether I am seeing a picture within a picture or whether that obscurity is the whole point. A shadowy web where money and assets can be moved over borders under the guise of legitimate business ventures, at least at the outset. Or a series of incompetent and bad investments and management decisions that have eroded and squandered what may have only been risky speculation in the first place.
Anyway, today I have been reading a Brainspark RNS of 6th November 2006, which is probably an area where RKB's thoughts have been directed. His research is years ahead of mine, although the way he joins the dots is clearly changing.....