Member Info for Louis10

I think it was you who introduced the tweets as some sort of "evidence," Rabito. Fact is that absent hard finance news, this is going lower. Another tranch of debt coming up for conversion in the next few weeks too.

Fairly sure I'm posting at my usual level. Bright side if you lot stop is it might save some newcomers from losing their money.

Let's see if LSE block Josh's Twitter account like they did to Jim

I think anyone reading this thread would have to conclude that the company is a scam

https://twitter.com/Josh_Young_1/status/1573158510627622912

Thanks, Rabito

Bit of an own goal that, Rabito. Thread starts -

Josh Young

@Josh_Young_1

·

Sep 23, 2022

I'm currently being threatened and disaparaged by an overly enthusiastic shareholder for asking someone a question about $panr.l. I'm now very interested in this stock. I don't like being threatened, particularly on my birthday If anyone has info on it, please share here. Thanks!

The person in question is of course Scot.

Looks like even the PANR board is getting fed up with Scot.

PANR needs to knock this on the head once and for all. Confirm they don't pay Scot and disown his comments.

Y'all thought I was only here to post links to Jim's blog, but like everything else you got it wrong.

I don't hate PANR, Eddie, unfortunately all the independent commentators/influencers do, possibly impacted by the abuse of the failed broker/stock tout who they see as being an agent of the company.

It didn't fall from 140p to 10p because some guy in Switzerland forged some document regarding a failed broker and stock tout.

Nor did Jim miss out on its rise. He's clear on these things: only go for the certainties, you may miss out on a few, but you also miss out on many, many losers. Jim also forecast the collapse from 140 to 10p AND the pump back up to 40p.

PANR attracts shorts because they know it's garbage.

OK, so back to why does PANR attract shorts.

It's a very dangerous game with potentially unlimited losers, so they have to be more or less certain. And virtually all the time they get it right.

They must be certain that PANR is garbage.

No point even trying to enter into any serious discussion here.

So, back in and before you ask, I wasn't having lunch with the PANR directors - you'll have to ask Jim about that (Scot must be seething at the thought that it's Jim at the high table).

Anyway, I think this post of Baxi's is a good place to start - why does PANR attract shorts?

I'm sure a few of you here are genuine. I have to go out now for a lunch appointment and a few other things, but when I get back later this afternoon or early evening I'll start setting out what I view as red flags. Let's see if a mature discussion is possible or whether the trolls will just try to shout the conversation down.

Says "130p to 10p" Scot.

I see PANR's currently offering 80% off it's previous price, but I think Jim's full price sub offers better value.

See posts on Twitter yesterday regarding such matters as PANR posters using a discord channel to communicate and coordinate with each other.

Don't hate PANR, just very interested to get a feel for how a stock promotion works behind the scenes and the interplay between the company, the controlling shareholder group, the promoters, the message board team, the PR houses such as LSE, etc., etc.

Not at all, cbaron, most people will be familiar with the illustration I'm referring to.

No, cbaron, my post explains the recommend numbers.

Lowest now since the placing.

Shareholders desperately need an update before it drops into single figures.

Mummy, mummy, Tony's made a huge mess all over the 88E and PANR boards.

Louis rolls up sleeves.

(Yes, you guessed it, his Oilman Jim fetish again).