Member Info for Louis10

"Without a flow test of the BFF at Hickory, it will remain of questionable value, as the flow rate is a key factor in ultimate expected recovery from each well. The cost of drilling , completion, capital and operation must be substantially exceeded by the saleable liquids to be of any value to an investor."

An interesting statement, Olderwiser, and unusually accurate for you, but does it not apply equally to PANR?

Difficult to know what this board is about today.

This I think has to be the most paranoid board.

...including all Scot's early morning posts and my post a couple of hours ago mentioning that Scot's posts had been removed.

Interesting.

Points for Jim, address to Jim. I'm Louis.

I think that's right, Desertsands , most are probably investing about as much as they would "invest" at a bookies. I also think the reach of these boards is overestimated. Perhaps a couple of hundred people maximum are looking at any board. It's highly likely LSE has little or no impact whatsoever on share prices. Just a place to chat really. The larger investors are on Twitter, not here.

And my name is Louis.

At the end of the day, I've been right all the way with I3E. It's not my fault if my numerous company relevant posts are buried under Tony's disturbing fetishisation of Oilman Jim. I think you've called him out yourself for this, GGG.

Looks more like he got it completely right.

That's you, Rob, with your zero intelligence contributions. Get back to your pint, before it goes flat, and focus on which horses you're going to bet on this afternoon.

Very much looking like Jim was right here - and Scot (as usual/always) wrong.

Unfortunately, VistaMan, Tony thinks I'm Jim and stalks me around the boards.

Re: I3, I've actually made some very valuable comments, such as saying sell it when it was over 20p.

Had a lot of posts removed this morning, Euro, mainly relating to PANR. Not sure why they took the PRD one off.

Interesting question is why do you have a Jim obsession, Tony? Did Jim reject your advances because he's not into men? Remember, it's just a photograph that you're in love with.

Looking more and more like he's paid by PANR as many claim, or a late night drunken PANR director.

N.B. He's one of the few whose posts LSE won't remove, even if they breach the terms of service.

Attempted to reply, Euro, but LSE removed it.

Daily tweet was a hostage to fortune (I said at the time it was a bad idea) and now we haven't had one for a week. It's no wonder that shareholders are nervous. Dreadful PR and a situation where a discovery might not even get us back to the placing price.

Let's hope Tony can keep it in his trousers today.

With Scot widely believed to be be paid by PANR or even a PANR director, it's time for Pantheon to publicly disown him and condemn his comments.

Reported