Member Info for Lothbury

RNS tomorrow apologising for late issue of the annual results and then Results and AGM Notice announcement on Friday, 29th December?

As there is no information coming from the BoD you may like to make contact with the person at Panmure Gordon responsible for MoS (Simon also specialises in Travel and Leisure, which makes him an appropriate person to help Epstein……! 😂). https://panmure.com/our-people/simon-french-2/ I doubt he’ll tell you anything but you can always ask if Panmures’ are going to issue Research on their new client (26 July they were appointed and all but silence so far and they are not the book runners in the shares)…

LostMoney :: summed up the problem.. lack of supply of product and when there is product it’s second rate and too late..a bit like selling football boots at the start of the cricket season…

Morning berniebassett : the NOMAD to MoS is https://www.beaumontcornish.com/

You’re correct, Beaumont Cornish are the NOMAD but Panmures is now the sole corporate broker replacing Peterhouse Capital. My comments, however, remain that BC are just NOMAD advisors (SE Compliance paper pushers) and Panmures can’t and won’t provide any financial help to MoS.

Good morning Cityilidie … rather than just write “rubbish”.. would it be possible for you to elucidate why you consider my post “rubbish”? Thank you.

Cititildie :: what, I think, Systemicbods is saying by posting the link to Panmure’s latest filed accounts is that Panmure doesn’t have the Governance structure nor the policy to use its financial resources to support MoS. It just wants companies who are fee paying clients for corporate advice. MoS shouldn’t expect anything from Panmures except fee notes acting as a NOMAD..

Sports locker buys the bits of MoS it wants, for a pittance, from the Receiver or Epstein et al claim they have a lien on the technology and take it for Zero 🤦🏻

“Relaunch…” “TakeOver…” “…Additional funding” Why would anyone want to back a busted management with a declining product selling, at best, second rate teams: players? And anyone with a good business doesn’t need their goodwill and brand name sullied by coming to MoS rescue; especially when they can probably get a quote in their own right. It’s deplorable how the Board have shut down transparency when, not so long ago, they couldn’t have been more transparent. We all fear the worst but live in hope we are wrong. Standing back and looking at this whole episode, I can’t but think it was an elaborate scheme for Krunch shareholders to get an outstanding amount of cash for nothing. I hope I am wrong.

Hepseal :: I was replying to Bluepun’s comments in his 9.27 posting .. I copied and pasted Bluepun’s comments; hence in parentheses. I wasn’t refuting your comment in your posting of 10.27 :: does this clear up your concern? I should have made it clearer that my posting related to Bluepun’s.

“… This board is littered with inaccurate information and bickering…”. Perhaps the BoD would like to make a timely trading statement, as they did last year, and all this “inaccurate” information would cease. The BoD are just as culpable by their actions or inaction.

The link came from the published Minutes of the House of Commons Committee and the link was to that meeting and the Minutes with Witness’ statements. I copied and pasted… Feeling lot better thank you.. Hope this helps. It’s such a shame what has happened to MoS.

Apologies Bluepun but I had a heart attack last Sunday and have only just been discharged from Frimley Park Hospital with 3 stents (and 2 more in a month).. so please send your question again and I will answer it now I am in a better place.

Interesting thoughts Systemicbods :: why would someone want to takeover MoS? What has it got that may attract a bidder? I really can’t see anyone bidding for MoS or a “Partner” making what would be a cash payment if significance. MoS has been gutted like a fish… with us mugs putting up cash to buy Krunch on an unsustainable valuation.

The Investment Association, in their submission to the House of Commons committee, made this opening statement “…Naturally, any unregulated sector will be subject to abusive practices by bad actors and the NFT and wider cryptoasset sectors have proven to be a case in point... & enthusiasm seems to have waned more recently as valuations have fallen significantly and many NFTs are now described as worthless[2], causing losses and harm to many consumers. In this context, the UK regulatory authorities are understandably focused on risk mitigation and consumer protection.…”.

Be fair : The House of Commons Committee report (NFTs and the Blockchain : the risks) only happened on the 11 October. One of the Witnesses, U.K. Finance, was less than impressed the way the rules changes are patchwork… https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmcumeds/598/report.html

Which means that if they are dumping their shares :: they’re dumping their association with MoS.. the death spiral..

Is this ‘Transformational” news good or bad…??

A big “Thank you” to all those buyers of MoS, in the last few days, when it was 13.16% higher.

My G’children (13 of them) are all hoping for a spike with Xmas 7 weeks away.