Member Info for lostmoney

Ok City ,what in my post is factually incorrect, just that ,factually incorrect …I really look forward to your response…

On the plus it look like Barker is a good thing (much to my surprise) and Bet could have legs as Mos is minority partner .The downside ME can’t be trusted with anything Mos gains from it

Unfortunately WeeDave the market response to the Q&A and Beta launch highlights the problem with ME and how his historical behaviour with Krunch and Igniteamt , nearly 1.7 M( that’s being kind) to his own private companies in 3 years solely owned by the Mos BOD , from money from dilution, off one of the last raises pretty much the next line in the RNS way 127k payment to igniteamt … really 🤔 how can a company solely owned by the BOD of mos with no additional employees charge for maintaining and updating the Heroes website, go on please explain that , no other employees, so as Mos BOD they don’t have the knowledge to keep the site updated but as igniteamt owners they do 🤷🏼‍♂️😳you say frustrating,I’ve got a whole other word for it ….. as for the face of Mos, he is unfortunately and it should be on a poster…

One of us City has posted 17 times in last 30 days the other one 37 times 🤔🤔guess who has obsessively posted more , sorry 18 times now🤣🫣🤔🤫🤣

The help from Mexican mates part is conjecture,definitely your correct about that

Pure conjecture I’m not sure 🤔 so my reasoning is igniteamt charges Mos for NFT development, website maintenance and services according to Mos own RNS ,so they will be billing Mos for that, so Mos can proceed with this new NFT ,otherwise for the last 24 months igniteamt (solely owned private company ran by Mos board of directors and it’s only employees ) have bee charging Mos shareholders for no real reason …🫣so City which is it …either we are paying ME via igniteamt to develop this NFT and website maintenance as per RNS or for the last 24 months we have been paying igniteamt for things Mos could have done in-house 🤣🤣🤣 saving shareholders from past and present dilution 🤫😳🤫

This is our Mexican football partners getting a mate to throw Mos a bone in attempt to raise funds , the advisors who just offloaded all the 64m they had might be a clue ….

This must be the good news RNS the Q&A was delayed for ….🤣🤔🤣 yes having to offer NFT for free definitely indicates that it’s not a failure 🤣🫣🤣

So what’s your thoughts on the sporting art division then silver,….. and it won’t be for free …… Igniteamt charge MOS for heroes site NFT development /upkeep and maintenance ,it’s in previous MOS RNS FFS ….ME via ignite AMT will be charging ME in MOS for NFT development for this …he has done it for last 2 years what you think he’s suddenly stopped……

Last bit should be time and time again till shareholders left with nothing

Good news RNS 🤷🏼‍♂️🫣 or more likely based on ME previous behaviour

Poor attempt to pump SP before raise

A excuse to remove money post raise ,not to expand ,but for igniteamt to charge for upkeep and maintenance of NFT site because that’s what they charge for as per previous RNS.

Instead of admitting NFT is complete failure any profits from BET looking like they will be used to prop up failed NFT ventures 🤷🏼‍♂️to justify

the main play, an excuse for Mos to purchase igniteamt if BET does work exactly like he did with Krunch …..it’s almost a carbon copy of previous times….

Techno rather than a freebie how about they update on Artist NFT you know the ones we have been charged a license fee for 🙄🤣or the others

As I’ve repeated many times….ME has done all this before and he will keep doing it time the shareholders have nothing left…😡

If ME gets Fish for NFT artwork or poetry all would almost be forgiven 🤣🤣

Bernie , now you’ve got that correct, have you seen Fish is touring again this year

I’ve seen him a few times over last few years on anniversary tours the atmosphere is brilliant and the sing along are great.

Definitely not a lifestyle company 🤫🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

And the familiar pattern continues, oh why oh why would we put ourselves for share opinions just before we decimate the SP again 🤷🏼‍♂️🤣 maybe because that’s exactly what you did last time it’s not like we have forgotten 🤷🏼‍♂️😡…. SP 12 months ago 0.14 Today 0.04 yes definitely worth rewarding that ,so let’s get money from Mos directly , ,then hundreds of thousands from igniteamt ,and add in share options …. Techno I’ve got no objection to Directors getting rewards… but ME and BOD is already getting double time for everything they do money from Mos !Money from igniteamt …now some extra share options so upto triple time , let’s not forget these options are just double the price of the all time low it’s hit ,and about equal to the SP of 6months ago 🤣🤣🤣🤣 rewards for a 3 year car crash of a company 😳🤣plus those fantastic Mexican holidays 🤷🏼‍♂️🤣🤣🫣🤣🫣ME has absolutely on shame and the rest of the BOD are just as bad ….i see Mr Barker has fitted right into his new roll ..🤣🫣🙄🤷🏼‍♂️🤣🤔🤫Launch party to get ready for time to get the jeans and tee shirts packed and those air mile’s added…Must have burned through the 1.4 M they got from Krunch by now🤷🏼‍♂️😡😳🤫

Actually change of prediction before 15 th June

Techno they know exactly what’s happening again 🤔🤫🫣

Techno , your right launch on schedule is good , but you shouldn’t have mentioned history, a very familiar and distinct pattern developing,City ramping like crazy even a nothing 15m share purchase ,Mos putting out an update for no reason just saying it’s on schedule, ME doing a Q&A ,only need the last puzzle piece for ME to claim fully funded not plans for further dilution ….again …I don’t need to post what comes next but if history is too be repeated, following this pattern for a fourth time (not including small deal dilution along the way ) it’s going to be a big one,but if Bet was up and running I’d put a bet on it for before June 29th (probably much sooner)

Dusty I know your response is to the article prion has link too , I’m referring to the article published by bbc on 1st June that basically indicates the only test available is PSA or this developing spit test

The article doesn’t ask for comments, but just scroll to bottom of BBC home page and it’s in contact us , then reference the article

Has anyone else gone on bbc website ,under comments ,to ask why they didn’t report a 94% accurate test by a UK company is available privately in America and via Bupa and Harley street private hospitals not being offered in the uk via NHS and the fact NHS aren’t helping support this test without having to wait years for an experimental spit test with poor accuracy .Rather than posting here and complaining here ,if BBC get 20 or 30 comments/complaints you never know we might get an article or mention, can also leave phone message if didn’t want to put in details on the comments form ? Probably nothing will come of it but got to be worth 5 min of everyone’s time