Member Info for lostmoney

City ,how dare you , take action for your own investments , shall we discuss your behaviour towards Roy again , with your team back then .. you absolutely hypocrite. Off the back of ME statement no dilution coming backed up with your TR1 I know what’s coming wink ,wink ,.. Techno I think you should find out more about your new best mate before backing him up … come on City , let techno know how you advise a man who stated he was new to investing and had very little knowledge..own my own purchase, wink wink

Your post at 9:22 🤷🏼‍♂️

By saying BET will probably offer no incentive shows an unbelievable lack of understanding regarding the competition in Mexico Betting , the other locally owned firms ,I suggest a few searches to understand the extent of the competition,all of them offers a minimum of 100% matched joining + and odds upgrades , I think they might have slightly better data base than MOS ? ,then BET 365 you know the one in Spanish specialty targeting certain countries, do you know how much it has cost them to try and break into new regions ? Just saying the Estadio relaunch will be the only thing they need is ludicrous.

Silver for me I would like ME to stop taking money ,from fundraisers ,out of the company , along with other BOD members,via igniteamt ,the only ‘owners’ of ignite are MOS BOD members, if they had confidence in mos success/profits they wouldn’t be milking it .charging for heroes site maintenance is laughable,second I respectfully suggest you read the RNS with headline expansion regarding Estadio,Estadio talk then Estadio BET .. BET updates according to that RNS are a few milestones away and funding milestones away ,least forgetting regulatory approval, not me saying that ,it’s all in the RNS when different funding is needed/planned baring in mind the reduced capital raised compared to what was required more pain ahead , but still paying themselves 100k + via ignite shameless , but a Q+A is pointless because not one Q+A has been factually accurate in last 3 years ,namely the false claims of being fully funded no raise needed,while actually organising a raise at the same time ,uptake of subscription well above what’s needed ,wasn’t born out via financial figures for livescore/cricket etc. or NFT progress all proved to be less than accurate.

So that’s a definite NO on the regulatory approval for BET then , don’t be so hard on yourself and your made up figures calling them stupid 🤷🏼‍♂️ if you want I’ll direct you to the RNS that claimed a 800 million audience,the ownership of ignite as per companies house and igniteamt fair vote RNS ,plus all RNS regarding complete ownership of livescore 🤫🤔🤣🙄🙄opensea for NFT numbers…..see the difference my stuff isn’t fantasy made up figures 🤷🏼‍♂️🤔🤫

Should read 800 million not 800

I apologise in advance if BET has been given approval but I’ve not seen RNS /release stating that , I look forward to being corrected

City what about JIO and the 800 audience figure you used to talk about ,we only needed tiny part of that with livescore ,obviously we now have to complete with WA’s very own Scoffman livescore ,on a side note who get Mexico us or him 🤔🤣the 6 million Bitso resulted in 9 NFT sales , and have we had regulatory approval for BET yet or will that wait push the Q2 launch back (if ever) . And the igniteamt with ME not voting to keep it fair the RNS forgot to mention the 67% left owned by Mos BOD did get a vote ,as per RNS/companies house ,so based on MOS RNS what did that make the vote …definitely not lifestyle company , more launch parties on the way 🤔🤣let’s hope they result in more than £300 worth of sales 🤷🏼‍♂️😳

It’s time the market introduced a minimum hold time on share purchases to stop all this P&D speculation and boys club trading and it become an investment market . No wonder the firms with a future are all leaving for real investors overseas.

Agreed Techno ,now I’m sure I must have missed this ( been looking into other things as your aware but ) 12th December RNS statement was Bet would go ahead once regulatory approval had been given , it must have been announced as part of another RNS or on the meet presentation because I’ve missed it . That RNS ,one line in bold BET received regulatory approval would get the market looking in this direction ( and if it has happened you can all post about it on here now highlighting it) now confidence is high on some fronts with platform design etc, to meet Q2 launch, . Now I remember it has already been posted previously about they have the approval and how hard it is to obtain ,so I’m almost certain I’ve missed it .

But I won’t do all your research for you 🤣

Also City please highlight what in my post is either bile or stupid so I can respond directing you to the RNS or company house reference relevant (but as a TR1 I thought you would have seen that as part of your research) 🤷🏼‍♂️

As always City you have no reasoned reply, but it don’t matter because it’s easy for anyone to see ..they have done it once they will do it again.. just compare board of Mos /owners of ignite and Krunch and significant people when Krunch deal was done, and Krunch finances as per both Mos RNS it’s all in posted RNS and companies house. Simple to see Ignite has 1 employee, the accountant ( Mos financial director) so the person that Mos pays, to carry out the the Heroes website maintenance ( as stated in its own RNS ) is Mos very own CEO or the other significant person ,another Mos director ..definitely not a lifestyle company 🤷🏼‍♂️🤫🤔🙄🤣

Your right , your not interested in this ,now ,but you will be when they agree to purchase ignite giving exactly the same reasons as the Krunch deal .. Krunch lost 85k and Mos purchase was 1.4 m ish .what will they value ignite at … not fantasy,not bashing as you put it ,but history , everyone listed on companies house as being in ignite ,are Mos directors, the one employee of ignite (it’s 1) looks to be the ignite accountant who is a director of Mos( I think that’s correct ) ..now I’ve not made any of this up the figures for Krunch via RNS ,names of directors/mos ignite all on companies house ,so my only question is if BET is successful will they use a dilution (same as Krunch ,after massively ramping podcast) off the increase in SP to purchase ignite or the first year or two profit ? Definitely Not lifestyle company 🤔 now apart from City obviously ,can anyone honestly say they can’t see this happening, and then explain why I’ve been very clear why I believe 100% this will occur , City gone for the your post rubbish argument 🤣 I would love to see an actual reason on why I might be wrong?

Try a reply from me City instead, not in stone ,listed in companies house🤔

Party is irrelevant really ,when you look at significant people and other director of ignite ( only 2 it won’t take long ) in relation to MOS board of directors, one search on company house , it’s a good job the RNS stated in regard in keeping ignite on the vote didn’t include ME to ensure shareholder value 🤔🤔🤣🫣🤣 definitely not lifestyle

Toffee are you still watching waiting for smaller spread or pre launch advertising to start on Bet ? Assuming it does

It’s not what’s done ,it’s the way it’s been done .I really won’t list all of it again but here is just one example of many .silver you say Krunch was essential,let’s say I agree but you see no problem in paying 720k for 51% of a company that lost 85k( let’s ignore the 700 k for the 49%) ,so Mos had control and reduced overheads to discover 18 months later the outgoing costs and charges had continued to ignite ME having partnership holdings in both , and Mos is paying for rent and Heroes site maintenance 🤷🏼‍♂️ to ignite, really site maintenance ,and you honestly don’t see why “as city says no business man” sees this as prime example of lifestyle company, and the fact it also appeared to be kept quiet,to the extent big investors on this very BB claiming no links between ignite/mos/ME by giving other names … and you can’t see why some have trust issues, welcome back toffee again , are you still waiting for spread to reduce or pre launch advertising to start for BET , assuming that occurs. City the party would have cost more than the revenue from Bitso or the zero NFT from artist , hence the biggest benefit to Mos/ME was a party (I won’t mention our new director also enjoyed it)

No city not bashing ,normally countering your constant ramping posts , trust me every one I’m a TR1 holder, wink wink ,funny how when you didn’t post ,in passing ( without mentioning you,or considering your previous input ) it was posted on how a more balanced discussion was occurring on this BB ,regarding the possible upside of BET even Techno pointed about a softening of sentiment by the less positive posters ,I think Weedave made a similar comment on the discussions ,and yes it started with Techno and Weedave balanced opinions but it started to catch on , then you started your constant Mos /ME does nothing wrong rubbish again., And no I’m not trying to save anyone,

After having sold next to no NFT I’m guessing Bitso is asking that same question 🤣 but no point arguing over that yet that can be saved for June 🤔and hopefully before that news on BET so all this will be irrelevant .Look the Bitso deal ensured ME got a good party in Mexico out of it so it’s fine🤣 and that deal for the arts NFT and look how well that’s doing ,🤫