Member Info for longtimeinvestor

Leas

Maybe you were hoping for a continuation of the upward move in share price after tfe made a sale, so that you could highlight his foolishness to him - instead because it worked for him, you decided on a different response - Pathetic.

Leas

''So tedious and naff members who feel the need to publish their investment numbers in order to glean some form of respect.''

A complete and utter nonsense remark.

This is a Lloyds Banking Group investment board.

There is nothing better to covey to other investors about a way of thinking than if a person wishes to show their actions.

''My average fell below 40p with the last dividend payment.''

Good to know the position of another investor but it does not show to other investors at what point you decided to make a purchase or a sale and if there was a reason behind it. You obviously include dividends as a way to reduce your average price. I do not do so. My average price is 20.57p.

As for TFE - after a good run up on the share price and a spike early today, it was good to see his thought process. At the moment that thought process has been a good one.

67s

Ftse 100 about 80 points off of days high - cable down to 129.5.

Algo may kick in.j

Hd10

''The position on public sector pensions is a bit more complex''

another cost to other taxpayers

Hd10

''The salaries of public sector workers are a cost to the exchequer ''

to other taxpayers

HH

''Doesn’t bode well for tomorrow''

You have applied ZERO logic. After hours auction. Sometimes those wanting to conduct a larger trade at auction rather than trade the required number of shares within normal trading hours,can get lucky with the price either on the bid or ask side. The shares were up on the day and very comfortably above the days lows.

The price per share is now 9p higher than when I made a sale at a £38 billion market cap in Jan 2022 - this is as a result of the reduced shares in issue.

HFD well up with results reaching a 6 month high

PAY reached another 4 year high

LLOY trading at a low valued £38 Billion ahead of Q results

Kk

''Why a bank like MTRO is out performing a bank like LLOY when it comes to SP? Considering the bank was close to collapse not 5 month ago ''

Was that supposed to be a serious question, or had you not yet had a caffeine fix yet?

S123

''What do we expect LTI?''

I expect Lloyds to have made a good profit - whether the amount pleases the market is a different matter.

Dt

''Are you still holding your Lloy short position..?''

He only ever had fake positions - he made big fake losses

67s

The 2019 buyback fund was not fully spent - the programme was abandoned early because further money was needed for PPI.

67s

The full amount allocated to a buyback programme cannot be fully spent if the conditions in the market re rule parameters,trade volume and pricing are not sufficiently met within the time frame.

67s

'' I guess what I really meant was I didn't realise they could spend any less than the £2B commitment made in the buyback announcement.''

NOT a commitment.

A share buyback programme to repurchase UP TO £2 billion of ordinary shares

67s

''48 trading days left to spend just over £400 million''

it doesn't HAVE to be spent - good trading volume and pricing required.

67s

''but it requires almighty optimism (on the scale of Chips) to believe that we will hang on to 60p.''

why when currently the Lloyds market value is so low?

DCB

''Democracy at work!''

Strange that you didn't say the same on 24th June 2016. and then proceeded for over 8 years (so far) complaining.

67s

''Debt as a % of GDP reduced steadily under both Labour and Conservative Governments between 1945 and 1990''

After peaking at about 250% of GDP because of World war two borrowings from the USA, the rebuilding of bomb site Britain in the years following the war meant the inevitably reduction in the GDP ratio no matter who was in power. Since those early years following the war, most of the reduction in the debt ratio came under Conservative governments - not a great deal under Wilson/Callaghan. Maggie's government took the debt ratio down by getting on for 50% (from about 42% to below 22% of GDP). As I said, we need another Maggie, as since her departure the debt ratio has only gone up. The Blair government kept in place the Tory fiscal rules in the first few years resulting in a slight drop in the ratio, before Labour went their own way resulting once again in big increases to the ratio, getting on for doubling from what was inherited . Tories were then getting the ratio on a downward path once more after the coalition, then the pandemic hit.

'' I didn't think you were bothered in the slightest whether national debt was 50%, 100% or 200% of GDP?''

are you getting confused in your pre old age.

The level of debt is not of great importance (rare for it to fall) , what matters is the debt level as measured against GDP.

Need another Maggie - when she left office the national debt to GDP ratio was down to about 22%

Coming to the UK is now only 10 days away - a production by the Socialists aided by a third of voters. The leading role being played by Robot Reeves.