RE: undervalued 1 v 6 mill1 Oct 2019 14:33
Firstly some positivity from the WGO half-year report …
https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20191001/pdf/44929j0dvfbszt.pdf
“The recently completed reverse acquisition by WEUK will allow the Company to fully exploit the potential of its projects in the Perth Basin, Western Australia and the Tesorillo project ...” “Tarba Energia SRL, the local subsidiary which is 85% owned by the Company, will seek to complete the full programme in 2019 and in any event, as soon as possible.” “The Group intends to continue its exploration, development and production activities on its Tesorillo Spain project … “
Secondly the reality check …
Given director participation in WGO’s raise I see no excuse (inside info, closed periods etc.) for our guys not to be buying just now. Director participation in PVE’s last raise also significant. Time for PXOG directors to demonstrate the same level of confidence as our partners.
When do we get the Italy update hinted at in Ed’s recent VOX interview? What next for Romania – Granicesti not recently mentioned? At Tesorillo more MT data capture in the ‘autumn’ (err, so now?), more G&G integration, then CPR? Clearly need a new plan covering Romania post Bainet-West, Italy timescales (bureaucracy status and all), and Spain where the CPR should have been done already.
How much revenue from Romania Bainet-1 – presumably coming in to Massey, maybe some hidden in accounting Receivables? Cash as at end-Aug £319k, plus Romania income, less ‘burn rate’ – when do we run out? No more revenue until Selva (Q4 2020?) and more to spend before production, so options …
More shares – need 500m for ~£400k as things stand?
More loan notes – I think not unreasonable for Selva?
Asset sales, Spain deal to reduce 49% option (WGO have money), farm-out, etc.?
My preference – run lean through to Selva production, do the Spain G&G integration and CPR update carefully and thoroughly. Assuming a good result, do a good deal for cash (WGO buy out some or all of the +34% to 49% increase option, agree with loadsamoneeeey, but want something – actually quite a lot, for the efforts and likely value increase to date!) and keeps us with some ownership but out of any commitment to funding the path to production.
Stay on strategy – active investor, use finance / geology / project management skills to improve assets, pay a share of costs and take a cut of revenue, don’t try to become an Operator.
GLA, please DYOR