RE: RNS29 Sep 2019 09:25
I think it’s a combination of very poor communication on the BOD’s side and probably (false) expectations created by previous RNS (“190k per month) and other shouting “we’re at 300k per month. conservatively they added.
Good for TB to do an interview basically saying who he is, coming across as sound and trustworthy but a bit nonsensical to simply issue the latest RNS without any form of content, communication, contextualisation. Very poor. The BOD should have done a similar interview about the half year results.
20,000 is utterly ridiculous. They have a million in SG&A!! what the hell so they spend it on. It is certainly not leading to much (at leat not that we can tell because they are not explaining the numbers): so either they slash their SG&A by half or they demonstrate they can turn this into
a profitable business ASAP. After 6
months of decent RNSs, this is a slap in the face and “back to square one for me”. I wanted to let the RNS sink in, take time to reflect, but it’s simply **** poor.