Member Info for LGO-fan

I started posting against your PQE mindless ramps as they were and are a blatant detraction only designed to obscure the fact that the core business of aogl is in tatters.

I started posting the declines of the PQE sp as you were only posting the rises.

You are some joker.....You of all people asking for balance! Wow!

indeed!!

So we are all legal experts now, are we? Just no way in pleasing some.

“Niet luisteren, Leo! Gewoon verder doen!”

are Dutch, Peter? Not sure I agree: the do the absolute right thing. They spent almost a 1mn if costs the would otherwise not have spent. As a shareholder, I am not happy about that at all. I am however very happy that they are trying to recoup it. Absolutely the right thing to do, absolutely the right behaviour I want to see from the BOD.

“Nee heb je, ja kan je krijgen”

shareholders asked for it

hahaha

the so knowledgeable posters....(make a sentence with these few words...rats....ship....left)

As to the CPR....probably results worse than our darkest fears.

Still...
could be worse....just checked SOU's share graph...from 91 to 7.5p in 2 years time. Not bad...dear Lord!

hahahahaha

is very clear. Works start in December, results Q1. That 4mn is a step closer again. Happy days. We are already well into October, and before we know it we are in the new year. It’s literally around the corner

that’s the issue with PQE: takes so much money, they need a super fast confetti machine leading to the mother of share dilution

I agree!! Really don’t get why the hell they refuse to clarify the H1 revenues. Why is that?! Is it incompetence, simply dishonesty, total disregard for shareholders? It does my head in!!

PQE back to 0.22

I totally agree. They should have communicated, there was a very positive story in there...."our guidance for Q4 is to generated min of e.g. $200,000 per month"...words to that effect or give shareholders at least something to look forward to.

Anyway, bored with my own point! (Just can't believe how out of touch the BOD...)

Equally, and that is what is so frustrating, all they needed to do, but still can, is to comment on the H1 revenues, and give an outlook for H2. Simples.

I get it :-)

Shut the front door! ("front" is important here).... ;-)

I really believe the SP tanked on the back of the "revenue disparity" between the RNS of 30/4 and the H1 results.

As to the CPR: I have seen this before with struggling small O&G companies...SH's get desperate and the CPR becomes the last "hope". It then gets ramped up beyond logical proportions. A CPR alone will not do much to the SP (excl some day traiding), but will not lead to any sustainable growth. A CPR is a bit "like a promise of potential". SHs will then look at the means of the company to assess to what extend the company can monitise said potential, and will then look at the credibility of the BOD... each to their own to assess how positive they feel about the latter 2.

Rarely seen a cpr have a positive impact on a sp

Fair points, but you are missing the point. You can’t issue an RNS on 30/4 stating “190k revenues p.m.” to then issue H1 RNS saying 132k for 6 (!) months without the slightest expectation. It’s appalling and shows utter and total disregard for shareholders