Member Info for LGO-fan

They are in the right sector, but a totally different sector. CBX has absolutely nothing to do with medicinal cannabis. Not even the delisted products is in this part of the market. To suggest that CBX will benefit from this is ridiculous. Your ramping hit a new low.

unless of course your guy is Eric Ten Hag. (he did pull a surprise win out of his hat, TBF)

hmmm....this link seems to direct me to footie...

my point: https://news.sky.com/story/amp/why-the-pound-is-doing-so-poorly-and-unlikely-to-rally-any-time-soon-12679183

If only someone had warned me about this!

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/21/stock-market-futures-open-to-close-news.html

that makes all the sense in the world, thank you.

Just wanted to come back to my question about the green back vs gbp. Whilst what you post is very sensible, as long as the us economy continues to outperform the Uk one (meaning perform less worse) why would we see a reversal in the usd to gbp exchange rate?

let's see what the next RNS tell us on cash position, cash burn, cost control and revenue development.

when in all of this do you expect an equity raise?

None of this list is even remotely true. It is just conjecture.

You guys just post lies to sucker in Pi's.

It's shameful

You are very good at mistaking your wishes for facts. "The
demand has always been there". Really, what demand is that ?
Demand for shares? Unlikely given the performance since IPO.
Demand by regulators? Unlikely given the fact products hot suspended
Demand from media? Unlikely given limitations on advertising from Google et al
Demand by the trade? Unlikely given very few listings since IPO
Demand from consumers? Unlikely given limited sales and the declining trend of CBG/D for skincare

So, when you say "the demand has always been there", it feels to me you are getting high on CBX's supply!

first off all: those billboards are a stupid idea for CBX. Pure vanity, with a terrible ROI. An idea from an ivory tower CEO who acts as if she is CEO at L'Oreal. This company needs to be a lot more streetwise and stop burning cash like this.

Second of all: yes. Something called supply and demand.

agree; it is just that some on here like posting the most unrealistic statements

costs for advertising tend to go up when there is a peak in
viewing, e.g. the World Cup.

Hope for Shs-sake not. It's going to be almighty expensive to advertise during that period. Cost/000 will go through the roof!

She clearly doesn't as evidenced by her track record since she joined. There is so far zero evidence of anything going her way. So you can hope for it, but hope as they say is not a good strategy. Let's see when we get the next set of financial results. Let's then also see if certain shareholders remains as patient as they have been to date. Writing, wall...and all that

that's a bit of a stretch. They haven't changed anything yet, let alone that we have seen any financial results on the back of it. I find their whole approach to date incredibly incompetent. It's like it has been run by first timers.

Pleased to see that a diehard like yourself is starting to recognise the "limitation" of the BOD. If all shareholders start relaying this to CBX, who knows, we might actually start to see a turnaround. Big if, but everything is possible if the rights things happen

Agree. You have a Diva in the driver seat. You need someone nimble, street smart, who rolls up the sleeves and gets stuck in the mud. Not this arrogant, ivory tower approach. Certainly when she has nothing to show for since she joined. Which is what, 7-8 months ago? Unsure when she exactly joined btw but her track record isn't pretty. So much could have been achieved in that time

it's a bit of a problem when you look at the current front of pack. It screams CBD/G....so really this "advertisement ban" is the result of a naming and labelling strategy that makes no sense, combined with ignorance of advertising rules.
Combine that with the regulatory fiasco and you start to see a lot of incompetence from this BOD. Pretty embarrassing

temporarily solvent because of past equity raise, not because cash flow positive let alone making a profit
some of the aforementioned good products are so good they are suspended
The category they are in is tiny and not growing due to lack of scientific data and therefore regulatory scrutiny
The sales is going so hard that there is zero mentioning about it in the latest RNS.

Apart form these minor challenges, it is all looking excellent

that is because you look for facts, whilst others confuse their wishes with reality (aka "the believeeeeee")