Member Info for LGO-fan

Healthcare does not equal pharma. You are going from one extreem to the next. You could have far less regulated status like OTC, Herbal remedy or simply a food supplement. Needs to be checked by regulatory experts but it is not nerely as complicated as pharma.

If you say that beauty doesn't care so much about the ingredients...well, yes. I quite agree. Then why use CBD. And why have it on your front on pack. Because no
nobody cares. You can see why this strategy is flawed.

I get the point of CBG vs CBD, but that is only relevant in the categories where consumers accept the added value of this ingredient. And that today is in healthcare not in beauty. And to me that is very significant because, if consumers don't see the relevance of CBD in a beauty product, why on earth would the (a) buy for it and (b) pay a premium for it. Because it has got CBD in it and they don't know why it is relevant?

You could argue that the consumers need to be "educated" but that is a massive marketing challenge which requires an awful lot if investment. It's the sort of thing even major companies will be incredibly hesitant to do, given the high cost it requires. Also, you need the scientific data for it, and we all know how difficult that is...

So CBD, "yes", in healthcare, but in beauty....that is a massive marketing challenge and one a company of this size simply can't take on.

All IMHO

I could understand if you only picked one share of a CBD -company and see it as a casino gamble. But why only choose this high risk, over hyped and under delivering market. Why not spread the risk and pick a few safer bets? Why put all your eggs in one basket?

CBD is delivering nowhere

if they spent £1m on marketing they will certainly not have £6m left, given what they stated in Feb....

Take away the "belief" element and look for facts.

IMHO, the next key facts will come in an RNS, with a in-depth trading update: is the marketing working, to what extent is it driving growth and profitability. After that we need clarity on cash position and how CBX plans to fund the road to further growth? Is with cash delivered from
operations (i.e. in case the marketing campaign delivers profit) or do they need external funding (i.e. in case the marketing campaign does not deliver profit). In the latter case we can then see how they get funding (usually via an
equity raise).

IMHO, it is that simple

Look at the SP at IPO
Look at the SP yesterday
Look at the SP today

Then ask yourself:
"So what"
"So what"
"So bloody what!"

People looking at the SP each day, definitely are NOT LTHs, doesn't matter whether you have "Ad" in your avatar or not.

It's all a bit of a joke. Don't get caught up in the hype. Use your own common sense. Only listen to facts, "don't believe ", but ask to see "facts". It ain't religion, it's your savings that is on the line. Ignore paid rampers. They are a straight line the poor house. Derampers may be irritating but they are (sadly) a much safer bet.

"Once the sell off stops, this will push back up pretty fast."

If I had received a penny each time I see that line!

I just love this statement. I mean the sheer brilliance behind it: "if no one sells any more and every one starts buying this will go up pretty quickly". Wow. Let me stop, pause and take all this wisdom on. Too difficult; head spinning.

If you want to manipulate, at least come up with something nobel. Really!

My friend..."you are persistently down"...look at the SP at IPO and look at it. now. What exactly is their to be "up".

You use these slogans that have no meaning, you attach people who have a different POV (i.e. playing the man and it the ball), yet I have yet to read one factual, number based, logical businesses rationale that explains how CBX will turn this sinking ship around.

Enlighten us, please sir!

how do you think you will get past the said car crash results? Car crash results will me an accelerated depletion of cash reserves. So how do you believe this will get from zero to hero, without the dollars to fund this?

This is true. Investing in penny stocks should come with a warning showing the % average of those who lose money. What would it be, "Capital at risk. 80% -90% lose money here. But by all means, come and join this fantastic opportunity !", lol.

pmsl!!!

the only fact here is that you got your maths wrong.

:) :)....you made my day, lol!!

could be
could also just be the expected bounce back after yesterday's sell off we saw across the stock market

agree, and isn't far nicer also to debate this way. As soon as we zoom in on facts, the nature of the debate becomes instantly far more constructive. Focus on belief and it turns nasty. This BB deserves better.

I also hope for everyone involved this works out, both from an altruistic and egoistic POV. Means you guys are all happy, I can buy in and be happy too.

It's just I have been burned, far too often, because I was too focused on "future potential" (or was it hope?) and not enough of grounding and cold hard facts.

My advise would be to start taking these thoughts to the next level. There is a bit too much "belief" going on here, whether you are optimistic or pessimistic about CBX. Thought the optimistic are definitely winning on points when it comes to the "belief" factor.

Pin your BOD down to some actual business facts and numbers would be my advice: that will actually allow for a far more objective assessment of where the company is. And if, these facts are compelling, than surely more investors will jump on board. So this is what every LTH can do

it does: you are "invested" yet you don't seem to care about the current SP and state of affairs and you have little to no criticism ...bit strange

A genuine and honest question , if you are a holder, how come you don't care?

Peter was nothing but a fly on the wall after all :)

The trend since IPO suggest this is only going heading south further. The nonsense some of the die hards sprout in here is an insult to the long suffering holder here. "Don't worry, none of this matter if we hit £10". It's all hot air, lots of emotion, name calling, but never do we read business rationale to substantiate their pipe dreams. You got to wonder if they are deliberately trying to misinform or just incompetent.