Member Info for Lenoman

KOC,😄😄

Treading, you lack empathy for investors who are suffering paper losses, classic narcissists, last time i engage with you, and i suggest all others follow suit, as enabling you feeds the attention you crave.

Aw bless Treading made a funny, with a laughing emoji, to emphasise how funny he is. Well constructed post mate, hope you get lots of likes to tell mummy how clever you are.

Scuba,

I think every investor in Eurasia has concerns, alligned with hope and positivity. You and many others have a constant negative stance which projects no hope and a certainty of doom and "It's all over " basis. Who is right, who is wrong, maybe the facts we know are not enough to offset the facts we don't.

Scottydog,

You do like the word probably, it suggest you know nothing and therein sums you up, how about Pointless.

Scottydog,

Unlike you who link the impending DFS to the board pretending that it will matter, whilst taking their salaries, pot kettle black.

Paulb76,

I spoke to Keith same day you did, and had a long conversation with him. I reported on this board how dissapointed he was to hear of your interpretation of thàt conversation. I called you out then as a fantasist and a liar, and i do so again so all readers can decide who they believe. You are embittered by your current situation re investment in this company, and choosing to deliberately paint (without facts) a distorted view based on your current paper loss.

Bill,

If you read Montz post, you will find the answer to your question, as in Final Opinion, which in essence means they agree with what the DFS concludes, and so adds to the current state value, or they conclude that DFS does not add further value, and therefore current valuations still apply. Clear as mud Lol

Bill, any company can mine a licensed area, providing they have the funds, but usually this takes millions of investment, hence the need for investors to see a DFS, which usually has to transmit to a BFS, (bankable feasibilty study) before anyone lends you the money.

Doc83,

I always take with a pinch of salt, people who "ramp" or de-ramp, and make my own choice, but calling people Scum, for whichever way they present their case is somewhat bordering on Paranoia. If investors have an agenda to either push the shares or be negative, then thats their Beef, they cannot make you buy or sell, and if they do, you should not be investing, and really how much difference can pi's make, to a share price, not much methinks.

WOS, thanks again for introducing me to this share, but shortly is a word used in RNS 's to the Eurasia investors, and that was 3 years ago, plus followed by "I believe". I did my dd, on this company and your posiitivity remains steadfast, so i hope you are right, you have been so far, and i wish all Genuine holders a successful outcome.

Currently 6.94 to sell 6.98 to buy, tight spread.

Mont,

Nice to see you back, a little bit of positivity, should bring out all the negative nancys in droves, screaming "what rubbish",

but i like it.

Calls,

For a laugh of course.

Bp,

I do love it when you play the pantomine villain , hoot hoot hes behind you lol.

Del,

Why would you want to engage with anything Winnifrith has to say, suggest you google him, and read up on some of his past antics, and then make your own mind up.

Summit,

Does anyone really listen to what Tom Winnifrith has to say, Sheriff of AIM, more sheriff of sherwood forest lol.

A nice reassuring RNS , so Not Delisting, Not going bust, and Not 0.5p all in all happy.

Massive spread

Toffers,

You seriously think Queeld will win this case, the same company that left Russia in a hurry, and conveniently "lost " their share certificate, before Russian authoritives could make a claim against their value, to offset on how Queeld got their money to buy said shares. Im not sure they have a valid case, although a British court may not be interested in how shares were obtained, and make a judgement on facts presented regardless. Whatever its not a fact that Queeld will win, its just your opinion again,which lets face it, tends to be very negative, therefore somewhat biased?