Member Info for lejjb

I'm 99% certain it was a buy - assuming you are referring to the transaction time stamped 10:34:01

Two £9k - £9.5k buys, that's refreshing.

dconors - I have sent you proof of my holding for the record, and what I said to you was quite different.

Please have the decency not to make bad assumptions about other people who may be suffering just like you are.

Allegedly, enough people who own 5% of total shares have been gathered. The intention is to call for an EGM to ask for a change in the remuneration of the CEO.

Should this be good or bad for an SP in your view gents (and ladies?)?

I see on Twitter claims that the 5% have been reached.

For the record, I pulled out yesterday (before the above count was made I believe).
For now.

I’m now in too. I was especially disappointed by the low take up of shares from the BoD during the primary bid raise last weekend.

Since ARSO allegedly deals with the public on Wednesday (please sb correct me if I'm wrong), I'll give them today to issue the required permits.

If no RNS to that purpose tomorrow, I'll start kicking a proper fuss.

This may be a bit early to draw conclusions - IIRC, companies can register quite late to the event.

And Ascent is understandably counting the pennies right now anyway.

That's inaccurate too - we did get "clues" in the RNS.

The info was just not specific enough for most of us.

XOXOXO

I have - stuff similar to what has been reported on this board by another poster.

I think the message has been made clear to him and he ain't stupid.

I strongly expect an update of some sort of what is being done, or about to be done, to be issued by Friday...

LOL.

Many have e-mailed him I suspect, but probably not politely nor with any clarity in their communication.

I have e-mailed him, but it was suggestions, not actual questions, so I do not expect an answer TBH.

100% agreed.

(That was in response to Ray)

No they have not. If they had made it clear, they would have opened themselves to a lawsuit from Ascent much earlier.

The conclusion of the report (page 21) states:

Based on all the above findings, taking into account the proposal for the presence of additional equipment for rapid intervention (suitable pump and containers for spill possible liquids), delay of the time of re-hydraulic fracturing in the event of potential abnormal weather phenomena and the appropriate qualifications of the staff who will cooperate in carrying out hydraulic breakage and will be able to timely and to take proper action in the event of an unwanted / unexpected event, I estimate that a low risk level for the occurrence of adverse events and consequences for the restoration of wells Pg-10 and Pg11A with hydraulic fracturing represents an acceptable low
the risk to the environment and in this regard to human health.

"an acceptable low the risk to the environment and in this regard to human health"

That looks likely to me.

It's obviously a pity that the pressure compressor and the pg-11 workover had not looked into earlier as an insurance against the absence of permits, but we are where we are and I expect real progress on those fronts now.

It did look amateurish indeed, but at least we now know that this money will be spent in a focused way.

And £330k looks like well enough to cover those costs, assuming that £100k of legal fees to initiate the multiple legal actions (at least 2 in my mind) and £100-150k to get and set-up the compressor (somebody who knows about this technology, please correct me!).