Member Info for LeFlic17

It’s great to see a CEO respond to what was obviously a full mailbox of investor displeasure yesterday also respect for putting even more skin in the game. Having a minimum level is the target for the VCP - I don’t see an accelerator for over achievement. Mind you there’s no way the SP will be as low as 484p even after dividends, decommissioning etc etc. I also doubt Kistos will not be acquired within 5 years.

Taking the chart in isolation with no regard to the company strategy and progress is just great for topping up or those looking for an entry.

I must admit I'm sadly of the same opinion as Trek. I've taken a loss by disposing of four fifths of my holding. I'll let what is left ride in the background with zero expectations and use the cash I've released to focus better prospect investment opportunities. Sad that my patience has finally run out. GLA

I think you mean 'may' make adifference LO - so far absolutely nothing even with some good news.

The malaise continues- will a new CEO make any difference? has the new PR non exec made any difference ( I know it's early) ? With an absence of results from the last how ever many months drillng the sp will just muddle along. I hate being negative but....

Why are folk selling on today’s news? They must be mad!

Manlse121288 when I get tired of folk on here complaining ECrr won't respond to shareholders I just give the office a ring and ask the relevant question, as i did today, often they then contact Oz if they don't have the answer and call me back next day - first time in over two years that the phone lines are not working. I'm certainly not deramping I have a too big a holding.

I notice the London office phone lines are disconnected???

Why would a fund raise be necessary?

to top up at sub £4 before results and next acquisitions

HNY to you TS, nice to see that the voice of reason on this BB is still around! I have to say i didn't find the interview very exciting, possibly because Adam is not really the person to be the voice of ECR to investors or 'viewers', he is a geologist not a communicator. What I took from the interview is the sooner we have a CEO ( or is it COO now?) the better both for LTHs and attracting new investors. Great detail on drilling and exploration progress and plans but as an investor I'm looking for a lot more than just that detail.

I think that is it for Xmas and the Xmas period. Hoping for a decent JV announcement in the New Year, same as I seem to do each year! Wishing a happy Christmas and a prosperous New Year to all LTHs like myself, new investors, Colin and even those who don't hold shares but like to wind us all up. RIP Craig Brown

and today there is news

how about three in a row with a four o clock RNS?

Not sure who you are referring to Lucky but if its me I've been invested here since December 2019 and now have 2m shares. I was simply answering a question from someone who I believe to be another long term holder here.

Check out Kistos (kist) Andrew Austin is replicating RockRose plus some.

I read some of the posts on this board lately and imagine I must be on the set of One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. As Bitcoin says " calm down everybody and be patient".

Legalwolf - i don't know the rules re RNS but itwould certainly count as good news
Tamer - I agree

Exploration license holders are sent a renewal notice 60 days prior to expiry. They then have to apply to renew before the expiry date. Renewals are for up to 5 years. It appears to be more or less a formality.

I would be more than surprised, probably horrified, if a person 'in the office' answering the phone to a random caller gave any information on appointment progress or potential appointments. I am also surprised such a person advised a random caller that investors can expect results this week. I have called the office many times as I like to hear facts from reliable sources. On every occaision the person answering has advised me they will seek the information and will call me back. On every occasion they have indeed called me back and given information/answers to the extent they are allowed. I would take the comment of expecting results this week with a pinch of salt, and the comment no news on potential appointments I think should be read as 'no comment'.