RE: Talking the Price Down14 May 2026 10:34
Hi Pedro, I value this business in simple terms, I know you can talk about PE ratios and what a mine in Nicaragua warrants by comparison to one in Australia, and some talk about a discount for being in Nicaragua.
There are more than a few well run long standing gold miners in Nicaragua, so it’s pretty clear we are joining an established list, the advantages are mainly lower AISC, MTL should have a 40% discount in costs to a mine in Australia, $1200 AISC is expected for La India and Australia mines are nearer $2000 because of vastly higher labour rates etc.
On that basis our higher margins are the reward for the higher risk, the facts are the gold is in the ground, 2.4 million ounces at the moment, and doing the maths on that proven resource today is $8.4 billion FCF ($4700 - 1200 x 2400000)
If the CNR and MTL management are correct about La India being a 5 million ounce reserve, that becomes $17.5 billion FCF.
After taxes that’s still $12 to $13 billion on 5 million ounces from that one mine, and that’s not going to be just banked, it will be shared to us investors in a dividend and the rest put to work, buying the future resources and mining them, the numbers start to explode with 2 mines, the incomes from 2 mines are invested and you have 4 mines, etc, etc.
We have from inception to production a 2 year time table with La India, why is it not clear we can repeat that for the second mine, Philippines or anywhere, $400 million FCF per annum is clearly enough to build a second producer.
Whats the value of that future? You own the shares and you get a slice of that pie, the dividend alone will repay your investment in a few years alone, MTL should have decades of production.
As for Gold, it’s going higher medium term, and all that fuels this story.