Just acquired a some more shares as I agree with the general sp consensus itself and the BB-personally looking towards 50p. Good chance when production begins
Appears unable to comprehend what represents value and what does not- He has stated time an again he knows better than anyone else and is always right. Enough said.
There is something that few like doing especially in a losing situation and that is review a position with stop loss thinking. It is better to take a cold hard unbiased look at the whole picture accept a loss and move on. In the same breath it is almost as important to pocket a profit instead of looking at paper profits and thinking its a profit -it ain't until it's in your pocket. Also a share price fluctuation on a daily basis so it's a sheer waste of time worrying about it on a daily basis set a time limit of say 6 months for this stock to move to the area you want. Set yourself a target and top slice profits- Ml has it about right.
All the indications are that an announcement for proof of concept production will be made before Sept.,and production well before YE 2017. Nothing guarantees a good investment,this one is the best I have seen in a long time- my understanding of events is rolling out as I thought they would with much much more resources to come.- the sp timeframe is anybodies guess all we can expect is the addition of larger and larger resources and a production date - in a normal world such a flow of information should boost the sp towards the 50p mark. If the known resources are expanded by a factor of 14 then there is some idea where all the sp value is.A very difficult share to value until much more is proven. The old Russian mining data in my view indicates far more than 14 sites pfor exploitation. A huge If - If al the resources come in as I expect this share will be taken out for minimum hundreds of millions.- if production goes ahead to full scale then the share price will value the share in the hundreds of millions on the basis that both gold and copper will be produced more or less at the same time. Do Not take my word or anyone else's. It is Essential to DYOR We are run by an accountant and the target for the company is a blue chip - basically afootsie 250 plus company with a minimum value of $ 5million with only some 114.5 million shares in issue the projected basic price sp is ridiculous.plus we have OIIS buying on the open market. My view He is basing that comment on what he already knows from the Russia n and local data. The downside is future poor resource reports- Make your own mind up.
Strong day with over 4% of the free SII traded. At least a couple of resource updating RNS bulletins expected within the next month or two with the potential of production start date news
Well pc, Again you failed to answer a simple question -what is the estimated product price WOLF need to recover its financial position to breakeven,according to you you know what it is,I don't,nor I suspect does the BB. What I do know is if the figures are not well beyond breakeven by now then wolf is bleeding to death. Suggested a short now -didn't you say many times I was shorting the stock I e now - once again you failed to explain what the worth is in shorting the stock or even holding a short now. Next you will be telling me the 2year downward trend in the sp has changed.
Right now it is total fantasy. But as time moves on and further resource data is released the share price picture will change. What I do know is GEO have identied all 14 resource points from old Russian drilling and mining results and the first area of rediscovery although good has yet to meet full expectations. I also expect the eventual total gold reserves to be well ahead of 10 million ounces making them a world wide recognised resource in gold. Right now some 35 million of the 110 million shares in issue are tied up for the longer by Institutional Investors etc., term leaving a tight overall market for the remaining shares. So assuming demand continues to creep up then the sp will move Made three additions to holdings at the 22p+ mark
By an accountant ! , The most revealing item in the report detailing the aims and targets in place for GEO are the words to transform the company into a blue chip miner- It has to mean the intention is in place to validate the total expected resources in terms of hundreds of millions dollars plus The intention is validated by the recent funding to extend the drilling programme. It is generally accepted the value of a blue chip company is a minimum $5 billion And we have less than 114 million shares in issue. Fantasy-make your own mind up.
As far as I am aware all licences are in place-the local licensing authorities are on side as the mine gives employment to the majority of locals.
The somewhat historic Russian drill reports are available to GEO. which is where their original information comes from It is reasonable to think the existing the fleet will be updated to 100 ton trucks with loaders to match.assuming the tonnage through put is going to meet the existing plants surplus capacity of a million tons pa It is also on the cards both gold and copper will be produced at the same time. One of the great things going for GEO is no plant CAPEX hence low cost and speed towards production.
You have failed to answer the question, let alone understand it.So I assume you cannot reason out why twolf is not for shorting. I have no interest in how long you have supported the stock or otherwise, spelling errors or how big you are,my interest is only in the companies future progress and how long it can continue to lose money so far the response is equivalent to less than moronic An intelligent response would be to present a decent assessment of what the product price should be to allow the company to break even. So as you boast of your knowledge what is the estimated figure and how does it factor in. Or is your knowledge lacking .
What has anything you have said got to do with shorting the stock now? as you clearly suggested I am doing?
It would be a moronic decision to short a stock with circa a penny margin for profit, I do have a single short on one stock which has fallen 23p since taking my position, now thinking of closing it-my short before was FJ From 68p to 28p when I closed it. Anyone who understands shorting would not give this a look- So peakview how is this stock worth shorting - Most value educative information even if contrary to their own thinking. Bear in mind A decent explanation would increase your credibility at the same time as destroying your stance ! Or are you talking ****?
Both buy and hold then trade on dips is my view. I had hoped for trading 15s but the sp proved too strong so I wedged out and paid high 17s,not expecting much of a dip in the sp anytime soon -too many IIs and good resources shoring up the price with I know more to come as GEO presents such a rare opportunity for excellent returns. The resource news will continue coming for some considerable time yet and at a pace as the funding initiative which I expected at slightly less than the remarkable 16p is put into play by expanding the drilling programmes. One sure sign of a strong market consensus is the reaction of a share price on announcement of dilutive funding here it is 35% plus up how rare is that. More importantly is the fact we have circa 115 million share in issue which is in a way proving insufficient for the IIs who are having to buy on the open market. The 115 million SII is such a low number for all the resources in place the sp will get sqeezed higher so much so if there is not a takeout bid and production goes full scale we should eventually be getting scrip issues. That's my view for the moment.
I trust all have made a correct record of their holdings- for future reference.
Concerning the moronic response by 52qi's -It is interesting to see the lack of thinking concerning how Past delays and cost losses are going to be recovered within the deferred monetary timescale if product price does not increase by a considerable amount bearing in mind a 50% production loss takes a 100% increase in production to make up for that loss assuming price stabilisation The company posted 6 month increased loss of $37million,A 10million drawdown was in March for running costs etc.,unless the figures are seriously improved how long will that last?One more to take. The boardroom changes are symptomatic of problems caused through differing opinions hence the changes Low product prices,past delays, extended funding changes all point to worse scenarios to come unless prices change substantially. A few minor changes in the sp Have no bearing on the product price forecast-the forecast is just that a forecast until it changes substantially into higher prices-meanwhile the company is behind its income forecasts. Hence calling the sp lower.what will boost the sp is RNS giving fiscal info that states they holding their own.plus.
All point to Expectations of a take out bid.
A good sign of value investment is the IIs prior to buying on the open market or direct they have to carry out full DD,in its way reassuring the PI that all is in order with company and its prospects An obvious thought -as the the drilling programme continues there will be a steady stream of RNS announcements for the upgrading of resources,specifically copper and gold so the increasing value of the defined unexploited resources will outpace the sp until production is announced-bearing in mind there are basically no serious capex cost for mine construction etc., That Non cost is why production is so close in comparative time scale as processing facilities in place. The recent fund raising specifically for increased drilling and the set up production runs all point to one possible aspect other than full mining which will take place anyway
The Anatomy of Frequent Podcast listens by Edison Research (discussed by Stuart Last) is worth reading - the pc response numbers 64% are astonishing. it would appear SLs numbers have been removed from it - unless I am mistaken- I thought it mentioned the magic $10+ mark and the £5.3 million income based on a half billion impression, with the mention of £10.6 million for the billion impression mark. My overall perception was the £5.3 million is going to be exceeded towards the end of the year on an increasing scale in excess of 20% so giving figures well in excess of £6.9million MA Watch on Shares of Audioboom Group Plc (BOOM.L) April 11, 2017 Standard Staff Writer Investors may be tracking certain levels on shares of Audioboom Group Plc (BOOM.L). The current 50-day Moving Average is 2.64, the 200-day Moving Average is 2.55, and the 7-day is noted at 2.32. Moving averages can help spot trends and price reversals. They may also be used to help find support or resistance levels. Moving averages are considered to be lagging indicators meaning that they confirm trends. A certain stock may be considered to be on an uptrend if trading above a moving average and the average is sloping upward. On the other side, a stock may be considered to be in a downtrend if trading below the moving average and sloping downward. Traders may be relying in part on technical stock analysis. Audioboom Group Plc (BOOM.L) currently has a 14-day Commodity Channel Index (CCI) of 53.37. Despite the name, CCI can be used on other investment tools such as stocks. The CCI was designed to typically stay within the reading of -100 to +100. Traders may use the indicator to determine stock trends or to identify overbought/oversold conditions. A CCI reading above +100 would imply that the stock is overbought and possibly ready for a correction. On the other hand, a reading of -100 would imply that the stock is oversold and possibly set for a rally. At the time of writing, the 14-day ADX for Audioboom Group Plc (BOOM.L) is 11.98. Many technical chart analysts believe that an ADX value over 25 would suggest a strong trend. A reading under 20 would indicate no trend, and a reading from 20-25 would suggest that there is no clear trend signal. The ADX is typically plotted along with two other directional movement indicator lines, the Plus Directional Indicator (+DI) and Minus Directional Indicator (-DI). Some analysts believe that the ADX is one of the best trend strength indicators available. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) is one of multiple popular technical indicators created by J. Welles Wilder. Wilder introduced RSI in his book “New Concepts in Technical Trading Systems” which was published in 1978. RSI measures the magnitude and velocity of directional price movements. The data is represented graphically by fluctuating between a value of 0 and 100. The indicator is computed by using the average losses and gains of a stock over