RE: freddie8 Feb 2022 15:23
I could only understand the RNS on a surface level but it was pointed out to me exactly would could be going on. We'll see if POG replies and explains what these "compromises are" But facts are facts
https://wtaq.com/2020/06/30/petropavlovsk-moves-to-defend-itself-with-interim-board-calls-second-agm/
Lioustiger owns everest/slevin and is good friends with James Cameron
https://www.ft.com/content/13669b47-dd00-4b6e-9d66-f255bf1d8d84
But all I'm asking POG bod is clarity on what the term compromise means in yesterdays RNS.
But I have to ask RBRAND why are you so gung ho for the the usurpers of POG who acted in concert (as they say) to remove the old board in 2020. You know strukov has a questionable track record and didn't he , lioustiger or both nominate the four new board members with Cameron being the new chair. They then all instigated the KPMG report that proved nothing but the price obtained for Pavels son's property when sold to POG was within market levels. And then the IRC debacle. When Pavel announced in march 2020 IRC stake to be sold there wasn't many protestations as 10 million for such a massive underwrite seemed fair. It was only after Hambro was levered off he went to IRC and helped turn them round that the IRC stake went up in value to a final purchase price of 96 million only weeks after the Strukov Lioustiger nominted board allowed them to go for $10 million. Then we have Akimov chair of gazprom bank again friend and lender to strukov along with other board nominee Kharin, authorising state investigation into Pavel to get him off the scene whilst all these shenanigans went on. If Pavel had been still in the driving seat he maybe could have stopped the sale, but he was conveniently silenced by his planned incarceration that still hasn't gone to trial. So Rbrand why are you so defensive of this shower of carpet baggers who already are shoing signs of income not adding up , lower gold output as they are useless miners, $86 million lost on IRC shares, who knows how much spent on KPMG who did't prove **** all and actually stated they weren't responsible for any contents in the report, and now we probably have Lioustiger claiming costs for a UK based injunction that everest instigated and was proved totally unnecessary yet they may seek up to 40% costs back from POG via his mate and board appointee Cameron?
How can anyone not see what's going on let alone defend these people