Member Info for Lawrence13

I think the dominant BOD members and their supporter's are rubbing their hands with glee. Some of the board members are muppet's who haven't got a clue what's going on. Hambro and Pavel would have put out statements by now.

A veritable recovery

Very true

From the Ukraine not Russia. sorry but my attention was focused on another %14 dive

Pavel is up around the 23rd March 2022 to see if the charge of getting a fair price on his property which his son sold to POG will finally get some sort of trial date. I'm sure we all wish him well. Alas freedom is starting to evaporate globally and not just in Russia- look at that globalist arse hole Trudeau ; threatening to freeze citizens bank accounts. The globalist themselves seek a conflict with Russia, We are now about to taste what our great grand parents did , dire poverty and war.

Trouble is no matter how far away POG is away from Russia , it still resides in a country run by out and out crooks. Its over we're ****ed. Our chance was in 2020 but everyone jumped on the bandwagon and I mean almost everyone that Hambro and Pavel were crooks and strukov and his cronies were going to clean up POG , get it on the right track. Well the BOD are loving this someone will either make a bid or Putin will seize it as he realises the importance of gold

My last response to John Mann on the 13th Februar 13@sky.com>
To:John Mann
Sun, 13 Feb at 21:12
Hello again John.

I fully appreciated its not your doing , however, the public absence of clarity and the fact that the IR Team is not sufficiently informed and thus cannot answer simple questions are causes for concern.

You know my concerns about things,

All the best

Lawrence Jenkins

So far there has been no responce

you bought more? You're an fffing liar.

come on what did I lie about. You can't answer can you you arrogant bucket of frogs spawn.

Shorts in this weather !!!! Go on laugh as there's nowt else you can do.

Talk of the devil and he appears, the man who couldn't predict inflation in a blimp factory. You still have told me what I lied about yet you ******

since august 2020 have been dead wrong so far. Wish they weren't but........

This company is now in the hands of Robber Baron/Boyar parasitic crooks. Can't people get that?

down 8% now. So what if Russia does invade? Where will POG be then

and there is nothing we can do about it.

Get the feeling were are well and truly *&cked. It's all over folks the Russian crooks who own POG are willing to see it hit rock bottom; they are long term schemers and will wait.

Further response to John Mann
To: lawrence ; Teamir
Sent: Wednesday, 9 February 2022, 08:07:47 GMT
Subject: RE: Derivative Claim RNS Number : 8882A

Hi Lawrence

As per the RNS, the application to the Court in November 2021 to end this lawsuit was based on the fact that (a) the Company confirmed in February 2021 that it would not take the proceedings forward, (b) Everest’s confirmation in March 2021 that it did not intend to seek to continue the Proceedings and (c) the consent of all the remaining defendants to bring the proceedings to an end. The outcome of the August 2020 RGM, whereby shareholders voted to remove the temporary directors and not to reinstate the former directors, meant that the relief sought by Everest had been achieved.

Given those facts, I think any discussion of terms could only relate to who covers which legal fees. Of course, Petropavlovsk discloses professional fees paid in its financial reporting.

Best regards,

John
ReplyRec

My response on the same day

Hello again John

Sorry to be difficult but, as a shareholder, I know that Petropavlovsk is at pains to ensure greater transparency and it would seem from the RNS that the Compromise it mentions with Everest is a related party transaction.

I have looked up Related Party transactions and I see that they need to be detailed in the Annual Report. So I assume that these terms will be included in detail in Petropavlovsk’s report in due course. Am I correct?

If so, wouldn’t it have been more “Transparent” to include them in the RNS so that shareholders get a feel for what is being spent on what and by whom on a timely basis?

Specifically, we know from the Judge’s ruling that Everest is to compelled to contribute to Petropavlovsk’s costs.
- How much was awarded?
- Has it been paid?
- What percentage of your total costs was awarded?
- Was any other special agreement about sharing costs with Everest arrived at? I ask this question in light of the rather confusing last comment in your answer to my original point.

Getting this sort of detail without having to ask for it would go a long way to reestablishing the directors’ credibility

All the best
Lawrence Jenkins

Following Up My Email of the 7th February 2022 where I basically asked are Everest having their costs met by POG for their injunction to remove the 2021 emergency board members which ends effectively today. Here's the first response

----- Forwarded message -----
From: John Mann
To: lawrenceTJ13@sky.com ; Teamir
Sent: Wednesday, 9 February 2022, 08:07:47 GMT
Subject: RE: Derivative Claim RNS Number : 8882A

Hi Lawrence



As per the RNS, the application to the Court in November 2021 to end this lawsuit was based on the fact that (a) the Company confirmed in February 2021 that it would not take the proceedings forward, (b) Everest’s confirmation in March 2021 that it did not intend to seek to continue the Proceedings and (c) the consent of all the remaining defendants to bring the proceedings to an end. The outcome of the August 2020 RGM, whereby shareholders voted to remove the temporary directors and not to reinstate the former directors, meant that the relief sought by Everest had been achieved.



Given those facts, I think any discussion of terms could only relate to who covers which legal fees. Of course, Petropavlovsk discloses professional fees paid in its financial reporting.



Best regards,

John

Shhh, you'll ruin it.

To soar downwards as Russian troops head back to barracks