RE: Pavel Speaks Sunday Telegraph18 Nov 2018 16:32
Part II
In true Russian style, however, the story is not without drama and intrigue.
The company was worth nearly £2bn and was knocking on the door of the FTSE 100 when in 2012 the gold price tumbled from its record high.
Petropavlovsk had racked up debt of $1bn (£780m) as it sought to expand its output with a new processing plant. A failure to hedge its gold sales left it exposed: the shares collapsed and never recovered; its market value today is around £205m.
“The mistake was obvious: we didn’t hedge. But our banks didn’t require it,” Maslovskiy recalls. “Everybody was excited about the gold price. A lot of analysts were saying it would go to $3,000 an ounce, so hedging was unpopular.”
Maslovskiy had spent three years away from Petropavlovsk serving as a senator in the Russian parliament, where, he says, his main job was to “throw out stupid ideas”. But he returned to steer the company through a refinancing. In the course of that, Renova, an investment vehicle belonging to billionaire Viktor Vekselberg, came on board as an investor.
Renova built up its stake to 22pc and in 2016 demanded the company look at merging its assets with some of Vekselberg’s deposits. Maslovskiy recalls the deal was a non-starter.
Matters worsened last year when Renova, in league with investment funds Sothic and M&G, ousted Hambro from the board, and installed four new directors, including Bruce Buck, the chairman of Chelsea Football Club. Maslovskiy decided to give the new board a chance.
But the final straw for him was an apparent attempt by some board members to alter the minutes of its first meeting. He resigned in protest.
A vital refinancing was completed months later, but delays cost the company $50m, he says.
To the amazement of the City, the turmoil began anew earlier this year after Renova abruptly sold off its stake to Kazakh investor Kenes Rakishev. Maslovskiy believes Vekselberg’s team simply didn’t know what they wanted to do with the company.
Shortly after a pair of “mystery investors” holding a 10pc stake in the company teamed up with Rakishev to demand the ousting of the new board and the reinstatement of Maslovskiy.
He had no idea whether the gambit would succeed: “My terms were very simple: our strategy was to complete the pressure oxidisation (POX) plant, and to save the team.”
The boardroom battle turned bitter, with the incumbent board laying the blame for Petropavlovsk’s weak share price firmly at Maslovskiy’s door. He was also attacked for allowing the company to hold a 31pc stake in IRC, an iron ore mining company chaired by Hambro’s son, and taking on the guarantee for $200m of IRC’s debt.
The mystery shareholders eventually revealed themselves to be Russians who had invested in cryptocurrency. Maslovskiy, for his part, questioned the ability of the board to complete the highly complex work on the POX hub.
“That board came in knowing nothing, and doing no homework,” he says. In the event, Maslovskiy won a vote by 52pc at the A