Member Info for Laverda

Agree George, that cost for the stock was paid from the loan facility, so will not be deducted from the shipment payment.

As you say where the money is allocated on this and the next shipment will dictate how much is remaining in LMLB.

But all good.

Humster, yes I made the mistake of unblocking them once and getting involved, won't make that mistake again.

Howard we don't have all of the data, but as a net figure rough calc I think you aren't far off.

However remember the overheads were paid for by the cash facility not from the shipment. The first two or three shipments are going to build working capital and repay the working capital loan.

Rob 28.5 days left if the same rate is returned.

BFD you are wasting all your effort answering one it seems today, but usually two posters, don't bother just filter.

Why would you reply to someone, based on your replies who says on one hand there is only a small resource when they have been arguing with me before filtering them, about funding of stage two flotation plant?

It is just nonsense.

They aren't worth replying to, just filter and let them talk amongst themselves or to themself or herself.

BFD after 4 years that DMS offtake agreement comes up for renewal too. More cash.

Neil, you may be right, maybe not, low priced lithium production in a low price market maybe make the asset more valuable.

The lithium products are being manufactured and increasing not decreasing, as offtake agreements from existing sources come round for renewal manufacturers may be wary about tying themselves to more expensive producers.

Once regular revenue established the offtake offers and any buyout offers will be an indicator.

Manufacturers will be the driver not the mines.

Kodmilla, if it's had blasted the roof of we wouldn't be invested and talking on this board.

This share has headroom which is why we are here and not in a booming high market cap AIM share.

Well most of us wouldn't....

Wow, four normal posts.

Market value on the other hand:

is determined by valuations or multiples accorded by investors to companies, such as price-to-sales, price-to-earnings, and enterprise value-to-EBITDA. These metrics take several factors into account in addition to stockholder equity.

Factors include outstanding bonds, long-term growth potential, corporate debt, taxes, and interest payments. The higher the valuations, the greater the market value.

A company's market cap is the price you would theoretically pay to buy the whole company if you bought every share at the current market price. In practice, this is impossible, since such a large order would cause the price to change.

Https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/122314/what-difference-between-market-capitalization-and-market-value.asp

An awful lot of green boxes usually because someone wrote something that made them look stupid.

Here is that link again, market cap/share price is irrelevant:

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/122314/what-difference-between-market-capitalization-and-market-value.asp

Https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/122314/what-difference-between-market-capitalization-and-market-value.asp

The whole article - I just thought that part was funny

Explain Like I'm Five

Investors use market capitalization and market value to measure the value of a company so that they can determine if it is a good investment. Both measures rely on subjective evaluations, and neither is perfect.

A company's market cap is the price you would theoretically pay to buy the whole company if you bought every share at the current market price. In practice, this is impossible, since such a large order would cause the price to change.

Market value is a more complicated figure that compares a company's earnings, sales, debts, and the outlook for its industry as a whole. Unlike market cap, there's no single formula for market value, and each analyst will place different weights on different factors.

Rotter it would be our portion of KMUK, which owns LMLB which owns the Bougouni mine that they would purchase not the PLC.

PLC share price is irrelevant.

Clearviews - there is no clear view ahead at Kodal it is too early.

We need two ships cash in minimum then see if Bernard thinks it is the time to release a simultaneous plan or get another ship or two under our belts.

What happens from outside nobody can tell. Interest in our offtakes, flotation and DMS in four years an outside buyout offer, a Hainan buyout offer who knows.

When the lithium was up for a joint venture we got an offer for a gold field, you can never tell.

They have enough cash to buy a big potential target at early stage too.

Which shares have crashed today?

Lot of greenies.

PS the AISC capital costs, are future costs, so really they are putting capital away for an event in the future. They aren't being paid each year.

As I said before AISC is the best figure to have to stop runaway dreams of unrealistic profits.

However confusingly AISC includes some capital costs not included in CAPEX.

Probably a basic fixed cost per tonne to end destination price would be useful too for investors. So it is easier to understand the difference.