Member Info for L0ngterm

Could be wrong but I feel that the remaining news in particular offtake, may well be backlogged due to ratification. Similarly I doubt the company will comment further on ratification as per your comment it’s down to the Lands and forestry commission. Positively though the opposition raised, that they would want more time for this to be reviewed. And they have had that.

Well if done now, then the PR machine for elections can kick with new mines etc .

So let’s see folks,

I’ll take today’s clear as mud trades and volumes, as a sign. The ALL, AIM game is afoot!! Gla

I wish lol!!

What was interesting was NH talking about increasing production in one of the interviews. Was curious how this could be done, increase the plant size? Or shifts any thoughts? Or anyone else?

best company is nda over off take , cool! mre could be linked to off take deal. the rest is basically political *******s. it will happen./

Well the P in pestle is playing out, if only the P knew that x= time and y=reputation

Loads of noise and limited action.

Well that firmly puts ALL front and centre stage.

If I understood the video correctly, the minister is stating that the supporting infrastructure (roads plus) to the mine site have started? So work has commenced

I would like to see the following sequence feldspar, mre upgrade, revisit of dfs with production and life of mine increases, that has been mentioned. Gla

My guess is once epa has landed and a quick turn around. To me that’s the only outstanding objection anyone could have. Everything else has been done? EPA (from memory) was stated to be next month from one of the ministers.

Https://x.com/lithiumionbull/status/1783311278468980973?s=46&t=gJ40HEpUT4gYZeQiLJHwfw

The figures were published, it was on C 1200-1300. Interesting take on the prices below and also the sweet spot for prices.

https://x.com/thelithiumminer/status/1774378507390296438?s=46&t=gJ40HEpUT4gYZeQiLJHwfw

Mul�ple high-grade and broad extensional drill intersec�ons reported at the new Dog-Leg target outside of the

current 35.3Mt @ 1.25% Li2O JORC (2012) compliant Ewoyaa Mineral Resource Es�mate1 (“MRE” or the

“Resource”), including highlights at a 0.4% Li2O cut-off and a maximum 4m of internal dilu�on of:

o GRC1024: 69m at 1.25% Li2O from 45m

o GRC1027: 34m at 1.02% Li2O from 160m

o GRC1024: 22m at 0.85% Li2O from 141m

o GRC1030: 16m at 1.08% Li2O from 111m

o GRC1032: 12m at 1.11% Li2O from 83m

- Results at Dog-Leg are significant; drilling has intersected shallow dipping, near surface mineralised pegma�te

bodies with true thicknesses up to 35m outside of the MRE1, proving poten�al for significant resource growth.

https://app.sharelinktechnologies.com/announcement/asx/df0113ffccff182673c1d11483ec44af

A fair summary of all the noise, and addressing?

https://www.modernghana.com/amp/news/1279887/give-support-to-the-plan-to-mine-lithium-at-ewoyaa.html

This just needs EPA and then it will be ratification, and hopefully job done.

For the ratification, it’s a straight case of has it been done by the book, legal process, if not easy objection. However chiefs approvals etc. all in, local areas chiefs (not political) fed back get it done we need the jobs. So any objections risking an election (jobs ), would be challenging for an opposition party to say the least. Noise yes, but cancelling jobs/votes I doubt that.

Can anyone remember/advise when the EPA wise tracking to land?

Curious to see if we have a big buy/sell recorded after hours. Could Piedmont be selling some more into any rise?

You can see how the politics are playing out, based on the previous post MIIf stating December, elections due in December. The ratification now helps support campaigning (jobs, growth etc)and run/ramp into modular units for early production. I feel sorry for those that need the jobs now, and hope any previous delays were not just political posturing.

Gla

I am correct in assuming the board have to buy in and have been, prior to any price sensitive inflection points?